Global Study of Plant-Herbivore Interactions Reveals Similar Patterns of Herbivory Across Native and Non-Native Plants

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1111/ele.70196
Andrea Galmán, Philip G. Hahn, Brian D. Inouye, Nora Underwood, Yanjie Liu, Susan R. Whitehead, William C. Wetzel
{"title":"Global Study of Plant-Herbivore Interactions Reveals Similar Patterns of Herbivory Across Native and Non-Native Plants","authors":"Andrea Galmán,&nbsp;Philip G. Hahn,&nbsp;Brian D. Inouye,&nbsp;Nora Underwood,&nbsp;Yanjie Liu,&nbsp;Susan R. Whitehead,&nbsp;William C. Wetzel","doi":"10.1111/ele.70196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A core hypothesis in invasion and community ecology is that species interaction patterns should differ between native and non-native species due to non-native species lacking a long evolutionary history in their resident communities. Numerous studies testing this hypothesis yield conflicting results, often focusing on mean interaction rates and overlooking the substantial within-population variability in species interactions. We explored plant-herbivore interactions in populations of native and established non-native plant species by quantifying differences in mean herbivory and added a novel approach by comparing within-population variability in herbivory. We include as covariates latitude, plant richness, plant growth form and cover. Using leaf herbivory data from the Herbivory Variability Network for 788 plant populations spanning 504 species globally distributed, we found no overall differences in mean herbivory or variability between native and non-native plants. These results suggest native and established non-native plants interact similarly with herbivores, indicating non-native status is not a strong predictor of ecological roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70196","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A core hypothesis in invasion and community ecology is that species interaction patterns should differ between native and non-native species due to non-native species lacking a long evolutionary history in their resident communities. Numerous studies testing this hypothesis yield conflicting results, often focusing on mean interaction rates and overlooking the substantial within-population variability in species interactions. We explored plant-herbivore interactions in populations of native and established non-native plant species by quantifying differences in mean herbivory and added a novel approach by comparing within-population variability in herbivory. We include as covariates latitude, plant richness, plant growth form and cover. Using leaf herbivory data from the Herbivory Variability Network for 788 plant populations spanning 504 species globally distributed, we found no overall differences in mean herbivory or variability between native and non-native plants. These results suggest native and established non-native plants interact similarly with herbivores, indicating non-native status is not a strong predictor of ecological roles.

Abstract Image

植物-食草动物相互作用的全球研究揭示了本地和非本地植物的相似食草模式
入侵与群落生态学的一个核心假设是,由于非本地物种在其居住的群落中缺乏较长的进化历史,因此物种相互作用模式在本地物种和非本地物种之间应该是不同的。许多测试这一假设的研究产生了相互矛盾的结果,通常集中在平均相互作用率上,而忽略了物种相互作用中大量的种群内变异性。我们通过量化平均食草性差异来探索本地和已建立的非本地植物物种种群之间的植物-食草性相互作用,并通过比较食草性种群内变异来增加一种新的方法。我们包括作为协变量纬度,植物丰富度,植物生长形式和覆盖。利用全球分布的504种788个植物种群的叶片食草性数据,我们发现本地植物和非本地植物在平均食草性和变异性方面没有总体差异。这些结果表明,本地和已建立的非本地植物与食草动物的相互作用相似,表明非本地状态不是生态角色的有力预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信