Spatial risk of pathogen transmission from cattle to vulnerable and endangered wild bovids in Thailand

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Wantida Horpiencharoen, Jonathan C. Marshall, Renata L. Muylaert, Reju Sam John, David T. S. Hayman
{"title":"Spatial risk of pathogen transmission from cattle to vulnerable and endangered wild bovids in Thailand","authors":"Wantida Horpiencharoen,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Marshall,&nbsp;Renata L. Muylaert,&nbsp;Reju Sam John,&nbsp;David T. S. Hayman","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interaction between livestock and wildlife causes challenges for wildlife conservation and public health. Mapping interface areas is essential for prioritizing disease surveillance, implementing mitigation measures, and developing targeted control programs to protect threatened wildlife. We used spatial overlays of habitat suitability to predict interface areas with high risk of pathogen transmission for three Thai wild bovids (gaur [<i>Bos gaurus</i>], banteng [<i>Bos javanicus</i>] and wild water buffalo [<i>Bubalus arnee</i>]) and domestic cattle. We assumed that domestic cattle are the reservoir of important bovine infectious diseases and that high cattle density is a proxy for a higher transmission risk. We calculated the interface inside and outside Thai protected areas and classified these by land use types. Then, we counted the number of bovine infectious disease occurrences reported in high-risk areas. Our study indicated that the highest risk areas for these species are at the forest edges where high habitat suitability and cattle densities overlap. Suitable habitats for wild water buffalo had the largest proportion of high-risk areas (9%), while gaur and banteng had similar risk areas (4%). Kuiburi National Park had the largest risk area (274 km<sup>2</sup>) for gaur and banteng, whereas the largest risk area for wild water buffalo overlapped with Huai Thabthan-Had Samran by 126 km<sup>2</sup>. Cropland and unclassified forests had the highest percentage of interface areas, indicating a higher risk of pathogen transmission. Our results highlight how habitat suitability analyses could help infectious disease prevention and control strategies and may also support wild bovid conservation initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interaction between livestock and wildlife causes challenges for wildlife conservation and public health. Mapping interface areas is essential for prioritizing disease surveillance, implementing mitigation measures, and developing targeted control programs to protect threatened wildlife. We used spatial overlays of habitat suitability to predict interface areas with high risk of pathogen transmission for three Thai wild bovids (gaur [Bos gaurus], banteng [Bos javanicus] and wild water buffalo [Bubalus arnee]) and domestic cattle. We assumed that domestic cattle are the reservoir of important bovine infectious diseases and that high cattle density is a proxy for a higher transmission risk. We calculated the interface inside and outside Thai protected areas and classified these by land use types. Then, we counted the number of bovine infectious disease occurrences reported in high-risk areas. Our study indicated that the highest risk areas for these species are at the forest edges where high habitat suitability and cattle densities overlap. Suitable habitats for wild water buffalo had the largest proportion of high-risk areas (9%), while gaur and banteng had similar risk areas (4%). Kuiburi National Park had the largest risk area (274 km2) for gaur and banteng, whereas the largest risk area for wild water buffalo overlapped with Huai Thabthan-Had Samran by 126 km2. Cropland and unclassified forests had the highest percentage of interface areas, indicating a higher risk of pathogen transmission. Our results highlight how habitat suitability analyses could help infectious disease prevention and control strategies and may also support wild bovid conservation initiatives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

泰国牛向脆弱和濒危野生动物传播病原体的空间风险
牲畜和野生动物之间的相互作用给野生动物保护和公众健康带来了挑战。绘制界面区域对于确定疾病监测的优先次序、实施缓解措施和制定有针对性的控制计划以保护受威胁的野生动物至关重要。我们利用生境适宜性的空间覆盖来预测三种泰国野生牛科动物(野牛[Bos gaurus]、斑羚[Bos javanicus]和野生水牛[Bubalus arnee])与家牛的病原体传播高风险界面区域。我们假设家牛是重要牛传染病的宿主,高牛密度代表较高的传播风险。我们计算了泰国保护区内外的界面,并根据土地利用类型对其进行了分类。然后,我们统计了在高风险地区报告的牛传染病发生的数量。研究表明,这些物种的最高风险区域是森林边缘高生境适宜性和牛密度重叠的区域。适宜野生水牛生境的高风险区比例最大(9%),而野牛和班腾的风险区比例相似(4%)。库武里国家公园野牛和班腾的最大危险区为274 km2,而野生水牛的最大危险区与怀塔比哈萨姆兰重叠126 km2。农田和未分类森林的界面面积百分比最高,表明病原体传播的风险较高。我们的研究结果强调了栖息地适宜性分析如何有助于传染病的预防和控制策略,并可能支持野生牛科动物的保护举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信