{"title":"Estimation of the BQ system and rock mass modulus based on the P-wave velocity of the rock mass: a case study from the Himalayas tunneling","authors":"Naeem Abbas, Li Kegang, Lei Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12499-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The classification of rock mass quality is essential for geotechnical and engineering applications. Commonly used classification methods include the Rock Mass Rating (RMR), the Q system, the Geological Strength Index (GSI), and the Basic Quality (BQ) system. Among these, the BQ system has been widely adopted as the standard for engineering classification of rock masses in China. However, its application and the correlation between rock mass elastic modulus (E<sub>m</sub>) and rock mass P-wave velocity (V<sub>pm</sub>) for the Himalayas rock mass remain unexplored. This study investigates the correlation between BQ and V<sub>pm</sub> for rock masses along Himalayas. Existing empirical correlations of E<sub>m</sub> with RMR, Q, and GSI were modified by incorporating V<sub>pm</sub>, and their suitability was assessed statistically. The results indicate that while the correlation between V<sub>pm</sub> and E<sub>m</sub> using GSI-based input data lacks consistency, certain equations based on RMR and Q demonstrate a good agreement after modification. The results reveal that correlations using RMR<sub>89</sub> and RMR<sub>14</sub> yielded lower prediction errors compared to those using GSI. Specifically, the MAE ranged from 7.5% to 18.3% for RMR-based models, while GSI-based correlations exhibited MAE values between 12.8% and 24.6%. The coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) for most RMR-based equations exceeded 0.95, indicating strong predictive capability. The results contribute to a better understanding of rock mass behavior in the Himalayas and provide improved predictive models for estimating rock mass elastic modulus based on P-wave velocity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12499-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The classification of rock mass quality is essential for geotechnical and engineering applications. Commonly used classification methods include the Rock Mass Rating (RMR), the Q system, the Geological Strength Index (GSI), and the Basic Quality (BQ) system. Among these, the BQ system has been widely adopted as the standard for engineering classification of rock masses in China. However, its application and the correlation between rock mass elastic modulus (Em) and rock mass P-wave velocity (Vpm) for the Himalayas rock mass remain unexplored. This study investigates the correlation between BQ and Vpm for rock masses along Himalayas. Existing empirical correlations of Em with RMR, Q, and GSI were modified by incorporating Vpm, and their suitability was assessed statistically. The results indicate that while the correlation between Vpm and Em using GSI-based input data lacks consistency, certain equations based on RMR and Q demonstrate a good agreement after modification. The results reveal that correlations using RMR89 and RMR14 yielded lower prediction errors compared to those using GSI. Specifically, the MAE ranged from 7.5% to 18.3% for RMR-based models, while GSI-based correlations exhibited MAE values between 12.8% and 24.6%. The coefficient of determination (R2) for most RMR-based equations exceeded 0.95, indicating strong predictive capability. The results contribute to a better understanding of rock mass behavior in the Himalayas and provide improved predictive models for estimating rock mass elastic modulus based on P-wave velocity.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.