Estimation of the BQ system and rock mass modulus based on the P-wave velocity of the rock mass: a case study from the Himalayas tunneling

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Naeem Abbas, Li Kegang, Lei Wang
{"title":"Estimation of the BQ system and rock mass modulus based on the P-wave velocity of the rock mass: a case study from the Himalayas tunneling","authors":"Naeem Abbas,&nbsp;Li Kegang,&nbsp;Lei Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12499-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The classification of rock mass quality is essential for geotechnical and engineering applications. Commonly used classification methods include the Rock Mass Rating (RMR), the Q system, the Geological Strength Index (GSI), and the Basic Quality (BQ) system. Among these, the BQ system has been widely adopted as the standard for engineering classification of rock masses in China. However, its application and the correlation between rock mass elastic modulus (E<sub>m</sub>) and rock mass P-wave velocity (V<sub>pm</sub>) for the Himalayas rock mass remain unexplored. This study investigates the correlation between BQ and V<sub>pm</sub> for rock masses along Himalayas. Existing empirical correlations of E<sub>m</sub> with RMR, Q, and GSI were modified by incorporating V<sub>pm</sub>, and their suitability was assessed statistically. The results indicate that while the correlation between V<sub>pm</sub> and E<sub>m</sub> using GSI-based input data lacks consistency, certain equations based on RMR and Q demonstrate a good agreement after modification. The results reveal that correlations using RMR<sub>89</sub> and RMR<sub>14</sub> yielded lower prediction errors compared to those using GSI. Specifically, the MAE ranged from 7.5% to 18.3% for RMR-based models, while GSI-based correlations exhibited MAE values between 12.8% and 24.6%. The coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) for most RMR-based equations exceeded 0.95, indicating strong predictive capability. The results contribute to a better understanding of rock mass behavior in the Himalayas and provide improved predictive models for estimating rock mass elastic modulus based on P-wave velocity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12499-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The classification of rock mass quality is essential for geotechnical and engineering applications. Commonly used classification methods include the Rock Mass Rating (RMR), the Q system, the Geological Strength Index (GSI), and the Basic Quality (BQ) system. Among these, the BQ system has been widely adopted as the standard for engineering classification of rock masses in China. However, its application and the correlation between rock mass elastic modulus (Em) and rock mass P-wave velocity (Vpm) for the Himalayas rock mass remain unexplored. This study investigates the correlation between BQ and Vpm for rock masses along Himalayas. Existing empirical correlations of Em with RMR, Q, and GSI were modified by incorporating Vpm, and their suitability was assessed statistically. The results indicate that while the correlation between Vpm and Em using GSI-based input data lacks consistency, certain equations based on RMR and Q demonstrate a good agreement after modification. The results reveal that correlations using RMR89 and RMR14 yielded lower prediction errors compared to those using GSI. Specifically, the MAE ranged from 7.5% to 18.3% for RMR-based models, while GSI-based correlations exhibited MAE values between 12.8% and 24.6%. The coefficient of determination (R2) for most RMR-based equations exceeded 0.95, indicating strong predictive capability. The results contribute to a better understanding of rock mass behavior in the Himalayas and provide improved predictive models for estimating rock mass elastic modulus based on P-wave velocity.

基于岩体纵波速度的BQ系统和岩体模量估算——以喜马拉雅隧道为例
岩体质量分类在岩土工程应用中具有重要意义。常用的分类方法包括岩体等级(RMR)、Q系统、地质强度指数(GSI)和基本质量(BQ)系统。其中,BQ系统在中国已被广泛采用作为工程岩体分类的标准。然而,其在喜马拉雅岩体中的应用以及岩体弹性模量(Em)与岩体纵波速度(Vpm)的相关性仍未得到探索。本文研究了喜马拉雅地区岩体BQ与Vpm的相关性。通过引入Vpm对Em与RMR、Q和GSI的现有经验相关性进行修正,并对其适用性进行统计评估。结果表明,虽然基于gsi输入数据的Vpm与Em的相关性缺乏一致性,但基于RMR和Q的某些方程在修正后表现出较好的一致性。结果表明,与使用GSI相比,使用RMR89和RMR14的相关性产生了更低的预测误差。具体而言,基于rmr模型的MAE范围为7.5%至18.3%,而基于gsi的相关性显示MAE值在12.8%至24.6%之间。大多数基于rmr的方程的决定系数(R2)超过0.95,具有较强的预测能力。这些结果有助于更好地理解喜马拉雅地区的岩体行为,并为基于纵波速度估计岩体弹性模量提供改进的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信