Yanlong Li, Qiaogang Yin, Yuchun Zhang, Ting Wang, Ning Shi, Zengguang Xu, Yunhe Liu
{"title":"Coupling analysis of earth-rock dam break risk factors based on the ISM-BN model","authors":"Yanlong Li, Qiaogang Yin, Yuchun Zhang, Ting Wang, Ning Shi, Zengguang Xu, Yunhe Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12495-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying the coupling relationships among risk factors of earth-rock dam break, identifying critical failure paths, and determining core risk factors are essential for improving dam risk management. To this end, this study proposes a risk factor coupling analysis framework based on the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) and Bayesian Network (BN). First, 16 representative risk factors were selected through an analysis of domestic and international dam failure cases, establishing a risk assessment index system for earth-rock dam break. A statistical analysis was then conducted on 592 cases of failed and hazardous earth-rock dams. Second, the ISM method was employed to hierarchically classify risk factors, and a BN-based topological structure was constructed. The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm was used for BN parameter learning. Finally, causal inference and inverse diagnostic reasoning were applied to quantitatively analyze the influence intensity and sensitivity of risk factors. The results indicate a significant coupling effect among risk factors, with multi-factor interactions markedly increasing dam break risk. The most probable break path is: improper human operation (S5) → extreme flood (S1) → slope instability (S7) → damage to flood discharge structures (S4) → overtopping (L1) → dam break. The key risk factors influencing dam break are L1, insufficient spillway discharge capacity (S3), and S4. This study provides a scientific basis for the safety management and risk prevention of earth-rock dams, contributing to improved risk identification and mitigation capabilities in dam engineering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12495-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantifying the coupling relationships among risk factors of earth-rock dam break, identifying critical failure paths, and determining core risk factors are essential for improving dam risk management. To this end, this study proposes a risk factor coupling analysis framework based on the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) and Bayesian Network (BN). First, 16 representative risk factors were selected through an analysis of domestic and international dam failure cases, establishing a risk assessment index system for earth-rock dam break. A statistical analysis was then conducted on 592 cases of failed and hazardous earth-rock dams. Second, the ISM method was employed to hierarchically classify risk factors, and a BN-based topological structure was constructed. The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm was used for BN parameter learning. Finally, causal inference and inverse diagnostic reasoning were applied to quantitatively analyze the influence intensity and sensitivity of risk factors. The results indicate a significant coupling effect among risk factors, with multi-factor interactions markedly increasing dam break risk. The most probable break path is: improper human operation (S5) → extreme flood (S1) → slope instability (S7) → damage to flood discharge structures (S4) → overtopping (L1) → dam break. The key risk factors influencing dam break are L1, insufficient spillway discharge capacity (S3), and S4. This study provides a scientific basis for the safety management and risk prevention of earth-rock dams, contributing to improved risk identification and mitigation capabilities in dam engineering.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.