Evaluation of Dynamic Scaling Factor by Correlating Quasi-static and Impact Behavior of Sandwich Structures

IF 2 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Daniele Rizzo, Leigh S. Sutherland, Giulia Palomba, Gabriella Epasto
{"title":"Evaluation of Dynamic Scaling Factor by Correlating Quasi-static and Impact Behavior of Sandwich Structures","authors":"Daniele Rizzo,&nbsp;Leigh S. Sutherland,&nbsp;Giulia Palomba,&nbsp;Gabriella Epasto","doi":"10.1007/s11665-025-11428-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Composite sandwich materials are commonplace in the aerospace, marine, automotive, civil and other industries, but their susceptibility to dynamic impact and quasi-static concentrated loadings is still a concern. This work has two aims; (i) to perform Quasi-static (QS) and Low-velocity impact (LVI) tests to calculate a novel predictive parameter, the Dynamic scaling factor (DSF), defined as the ratio of LVI to QS results. The DSF allows the prediction of the impact behaviour by easier and lower-cost quasi-static tests. (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of Aluminium honeycomb sandwich (AHS) as a new sustainable alternative to composite sandwich. The mechanical tests were carried out using two different tups, hemispherical and conical, and damage detection employed Non-destructive techniques (NDT), specifically x-ray digital radiography. Two ‘traditional’ composite sandwich solutions, a thinner, lighter GFRP/PVC laminate and a thicker, heavier GFRP/balsa one, were compared with two AHS panels of equivalent bending stiffness to the composite sandwiches. For the perforation of the upper face only, results indicated that AHS absorbed more energy. If the complete perforation of the whole sandwich is considered, GFRP/PVC and GFRP/balsa sandwich composites absorbed more energy. The DSF was found to be greater than or equal to unity, varying between 1 and 2, depending on laminate thickness, material, tup geometry, and damage level considered. When perforation of the first skin is important, AHS can provide a new viable high-performance lightweight alternative to ‘traditional’ composites in terms of impact strength whilst providing a more sustainable alternative. This makes AHS a valuable new material choice in marine applications that emphasises weight reduction, energy efficiency and recyclability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","volume":"34 15","pages":"15376 - 15388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-025-11428-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Composite sandwich materials are commonplace in the aerospace, marine, automotive, civil and other industries, but their susceptibility to dynamic impact and quasi-static concentrated loadings is still a concern. This work has two aims; (i) to perform Quasi-static (QS) and Low-velocity impact (LVI) tests to calculate a novel predictive parameter, the Dynamic scaling factor (DSF), defined as the ratio of LVI to QS results. The DSF allows the prediction of the impact behaviour by easier and lower-cost quasi-static tests. (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of Aluminium honeycomb sandwich (AHS) as a new sustainable alternative to composite sandwich. The mechanical tests were carried out using two different tups, hemispherical and conical, and damage detection employed Non-destructive techniques (NDT), specifically x-ray digital radiography. Two ‘traditional’ composite sandwich solutions, a thinner, lighter GFRP/PVC laminate and a thicker, heavier GFRP/balsa one, were compared with two AHS panels of equivalent bending stiffness to the composite sandwiches. For the perforation of the upper face only, results indicated that AHS absorbed more energy. If the complete perforation of the whole sandwich is considered, GFRP/PVC and GFRP/balsa sandwich composites absorbed more energy. The DSF was found to be greater than or equal to unity, varying between 1 and 2, depending on laminate thickness, material, tup geometry, and damage level considered. When perforation of the first skin is important, AHS can provide a new viable high-performance lightweight alternative to ‘traditional’ composites in terms of impact strength whilst providing a more sustainable alternative. This makes AHS a valuable new material choice in marine applications that emphasises weight reduction, energy efficiency and recyclability.

结合夹层结构准静力与冲击行为评价动态标度因子
复合夹层材料在航空航天、船舶、汽车、民用等行业中应用广泛,但其对动态冲击和准静态集中载荷的敏感性仍然是一个值得关注的问题。这项工作有两个目的;(i)执行准静态(QS)和低速撞击(LVI)测试,以计算一个新的预测参数,即动态比例因子(DSF),定义为LVI与QS结果的比率。DSF允许通过更容易和成本更低的准静态测试来预测冲击行为。(ii)评估铝蜂窝夹层结构(AHS)作为复合材料夹层结构新的可持续替代品的可行性。机械测试采用两种不同的方式进行,半球形和锥形,损伤检测采用非破坏性技术(NDT),特别是x射线数字射线摄影。两种“传统”复合材料夹层解决方案,一种更薄、更轻的GFRP/PVC层压板和一种更厚、更重的GFRP/balsa层压板,与复合材料夹层具有等效弯曲刚度的两块AHS板进行了比较。仅对于上面部穿孔,结果表明AHS吸收更多的能量。如果考虑整个夹层的完全穿孔,GFRP/PVC和GFRP/balsa夹层复合材料吸收的能量更多。发现DSF大于或等于1,根据层压厚度,材料,顶部几何形状和考虑的损伤程度在1和2之间变化。当第一层表皮的穿孔很重要时,AHS可以在冲击强度方面提供一种新的可行的高性能轻质替代“传统”复合材料,同时提供一种更可持续的替代方案。这使得AHS在强调重量减轻、能源效率和可回收性的船舶应用中成为一种有价值的新材料选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1120
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: ASM International''s Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance focuses on solving day-to-day engineering challenges, particularly those involving components for larger systems. The journal presents a clear understanding of relationships between materials selection, processing, applications and performance. The Journal of Materials Engineering covers all aspects of materials selection, design, processing, characterization and evaluation, including how to improve materials properties through processes and process control of casting, forming, heat treating, surface modification and coating, and fabrication. Testing and characterization (including mechanical and physical tests, NDE, metallography, failure analysis, corrosion resistance, chemical analysis, surface characterization, and microanalysis of surfaces, features and fractures), and industrial performance measurement are also covered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信