Matthew C. Broomer , Caroline E. Clark , Jan Shanelle J. Iringan , Michael W. Wang , Nicholas J. Beacher , Da-Ting Lin
{"title":"Using miniscopes and deep learning to compare neurobehavioral representations of psychostimulant and opioid self-administration","authors":"Matthew C. Broomer , Caroline E. Clark , Jan Shanelle J. Iringan , Michael W. Wang , Nicholas J. Beacher , Da-Ting Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.addicn.2025.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concurrent abuse of psychostimulants and opioids represents a growing public health concern. However, preclinical models of substance use disorder often situate psychostimulants and opioids similarly within a unified self-administration procedure. This approach may fail to capture important differences in neurobehavioral activity related to each drug type. A large volume of <em>in vivo</em> literature suggests that, within canonical reward-related brain regions such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc), multiple reward-seeking behaviors may be represented by distinct neural populations. This comparison is often made between drug and natural rewards, however there is evidence for a similar distinction between psychostimulants and opioids. Here, we review the evidence for distinct neurobehavioral characteristics of psychostimulant versus opioid self-administration and consider the utility of two experimental approaches—miniscope calcium imaging and deep learning-assisted behavior analysis—in further exploring this topic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72067,"journal":{"name":"Addiction neuroscience","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772392525000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Concurrent abuse of psychostimulants and opioids represents a growing public health concern. However, preclinical models of substance use disorder often situate psychostimulants and opioids similarly within a unified self-administration procedure. This approach may fail to capture important differences in neurobehavioral activity related to each drug type. A large volume of in vivo literature suggests that, within canonical reward-related brain regions such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc), multiple reward-seeking behaviors may be represented by distinct neural populations. This comparison is often made between drug and natural rewards, however there is evidence for a similar distinction between psychostimulants and opioids. Here, we review the evidence for distinct neurobehavioral characteristics of psychostimulant versus opioid self-administration and consider the utility of two experimental approaches—miniscope calcium imaging and deep learning-assisted behavior analysis—in further exploring this topic.