Does pharmacist–patient gender discordance influence medication guidance for gender-specific diseases?

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Manato Nomi , Ryota Kumaki , Rieko Takehira , Etsuko Arita , Keiko Kishimoto
{"title":"Does pharmacist–patient gender discordance influence medication guidance for gender-specific diseases?","authors":"Manato Nomi ,&nbsp;Ryota Kumaki ,&nbsp;Rieko Takehira ,&nbsp;Etsuko Arita ,&nbsp;Keiko Kishimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to determine whether community pharmacists perceive barriers to providing medication guidance for gender-specific diseases and to clarify whether these perceived barriers are influenced by pharmacist and patient gender concordance or discordance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A web-based survey was conducted with pharmacists from five pharmacy groups in Japan. The questionnaire evaluated pharmacists' hesitancy and uncertainty in knowledge using a 7-point Likert scale across 10 gender-specific and three nongender-specific diseases. Each disease was examined under conditions of gender concordance and discordance between a pharmacist and patient. Results were visualized using scatter plots, and the factors contributing to barriers were examined using multivariable logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1315 responses were obtained, including 696 from female pharmacists and 583 from male pharmacists. Among the 10 gender-specific diseases, 9 were in the first quadrant, indicating high hesitancy and uncertainty under gender discordance. However, some diseases exhibited high perceived barriers even under gender concordance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pharmacists' implicit assumptions, such as perceiving patients' unwillingness to receive guidance, significantly contributed to stronger perceived barriers. Furthermore, neither years of professional experience nor medication guidance frequency was associated with reduced barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Community pharmacists perceived significant barriers to providing medication guidance for certain gender-specific diseases. These barriers existed in cases of gender discordance and concordance with patients. Pharmacists' experience alone is insufficient to reduce these perceptions, highlighting the need for educational interventions addressing implicit assumptions related to gender-specific care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine whether community pharmacists perceive barriers to providing medication guidance for gender-specific diseases and to clarify whether these perceived barriers are influenced by pharmacist and patient gender concordance or discordance.

Methods

A web-based survey was conducted with pharmacists from five pharmacy groups in Japan. The questionnaire evaluated pharmacists' hesitancy and uncertainty in knowledge using a 7-point Likert scale across 10 gender-specific and three nongender-specific diseases. Each disease was examined under conditions of gender concordance and discordance between a pharmacist and patient. Results were visualized using scatter plots, and the factors contributing to barriers were examined using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

A total of 1315 responses were obtained, including 696 from female pharmacists and 583 from male pharmacists. Among the 10 gender-specific diseases, 9 were in the first quadrant, indicating high hesitancy and uncertainty under gender discordance. However, some diseases exhibited high perceived barriers even under gender concordance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pharmacists' implicit assumptions, such as perceiving patients' unwillingness to receive guidance, significantly contributed to stronger perceived barriers. Furthermore, neither years of professional experience nor medication guidance frequency was associated with reduced barriers.

Conclusion

Community pharmacists perceived significant barriers to providing medication guidance for certain gender-specific diseases. These barriers existed in cases of gender discordance and concordance with patients. Pharmacists' experience alone is insufficient to reduce these perceptions, highlighting the need for educational interventions addressing implicit assumptions related to gender-specific care.
药师-患者性别不一致是否会影响针对性别特异性疾病的用药指导?
背景本研究旨在确定社区药剂师是否感知到障碍,以提供针对性别特异性疾病的药物指导,并澄清这些感知障碍是否受到药剂师和患者性别一致性或不一致性的影响。方法采用网络调查方法,对日本5个药局药师进行调查。问卷使用7分李克特量表评估药剂师在10种性别特异性疾病和3种非性别特异性疾病方面的犹豫和不确定性。每种疾病都是在药剂师和患者性别一致和不一致的条件下进行检查的。结果用散点图可视化,并使用多变量逻辑回归检查导致障碍的因素。结果共收到问卷1315份,其中女药师696份,男药师583份。在10种性别特异性疾病中,有9种在第一象限,表明性别不一致下的高犹豫性和不确定性。然而,即使在性别一致的情况下,一些疾病也表现出高度的感知障碍。多因素logistic回归分析显示,药师的内隐假设(如感知患者不愿接受指导)显著促进了感知障碍的增强。此外,专业经验的年数和药物指导的频率都与障碍的减少无关。结论社区药师对某些性别疾病的用药指导存在较大障碍。这些障碍存在于性别不一致和与患者一致的情况下。仅凭药剂师的经验不足以减少这些看法,强调需要进行教育干预,解决与性别特异性护理相关的隐性假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信