How mode of evacuation, roadway environment, and traffic conditions relate to injury severity score? Untangling the role of pre-hospital time in road crashes

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Zia-ur- Rehman , Numan Ahmad , Afzal Ahmed , Syed Kamran Hussain Shah , Dr.Izza Anwer
{"title":"How mode of evacuation, roadway environment, and traffic conditions relate to injury severity score? Untangling the role of pre-hospital time in road crashes","authors":"Zia-ur- Rehman ,&nbsp;Numan Ahmad ,&nbsp;Afzal Ahmed ,&nbsp;Syed Kamran Hussain Shah ,&nbsp;Dr.Izza Anwer","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the effects of some of the key factors, including emergency response measures, roadway and environment, traffic-related attributes, and crash-specific factors, on the Injury Severity Score (ISS) of Road Traffic Crashes’ (RTCs) victims, both directly and through pre-hospital time (PHT), using rigorous path analysis. Data for 298,654 crashes, compiled by the Road Traffic Injury Research and Prevention Center (RTIRPC) in Karachi (Pakistan), were used for analyses. Owing to the corner-solution distribution of the response variables (PHT and ISS), two Tobit regression models are estimated after accounting for missing values through synthetic data generation. Marginal effects from these models are used in the path analysis. The findings suggest that ISS increases by 0.01 units with a unit increase in PHT, highlighting the critical need for rapid evacuation of crash victims to medical facilities. The mode of evacuation emerged as a crucial factor, with ambulances resulting in increased PHT and ISS compared to private or public transport, underscoring the improvement needed in the dedicated ambulance-based emergency response. PHT and ISS were found to be higher in nighttime crashes, necessitating better emergency medical services (EMS) response during the night. Intersection crashes were associated with lower PHT and ISS; whereas, crashes on undivided roads and those involving multiple or large vehicles increased PHT and ISS. The path analysis revealed that the overall effects of some of the key variables on ISS were higher than their direct effects – something that could not be explored without the path analysis. These insights can help policymakers develop strategies to improve emergency response and road safety, ultimately reducing the number of RTC-related injuries and fatalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 10","pages":"Article 112668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the effects of some of the key factors, including emergency response measures, roadway and environment, traffic-related attributes, and crash-specific factors, on the Injury Severity Score (ISS) of Road Traffic Crashes’ (RTCs) victims, both directly and through pre-hospital time (PHT), using rigorous path analysis. Data for 298,654 crashes, compiled by the Road Traffic Injury Research and Prevention Center (RTIRPC) in Karachi (Pakistan), were used for analyses. Owing to the corner-solution distribution of the response variables (PHT and ISS), two Tobit regression models are estimated after accounting for missing values through synthetic data generation. Marginal effects from these models are used in the path analysis. The findings suggest that ISS increases by 0.01 units with a unit increase in PHT, highlighting the critical need for rapid evacuation of crash victims to medical facilities. The mode of evacuation emerged as a crucial factor, with ambulances resulting in increased PHT and ISS compared to private or public transport, underscoring the improvement needed in the dedicated ambulance-based emergency response. PHT and ISS were found to be higher in nighttime crashes, necessitating better emergency medical services (EMS) response during the night. Intersection crashes were associated with lower PHT and ISS; whereas, crashes on undivided roads and those involving multiple or large vehicles increased PHT and ISS. The path analysis revealed that the overall effects of some of the key variables on ISS were higher than their direct effects – something that could not be explored without the path analysis. These insights can help policymakers develop strategies to improve emergency response and road safety, ultimately reducing the number of RTC-related injuries and fatalities.
疏散方式、道路环境和交通状况如何与伤害严重程度评分相关?解开院前时间在道路交通事故中的作用
本研究利用严格的路径分析,探讨了一些关键因素,包括应急响应措施、道路和环境、交通相关属性和碰撞特定因素,对道路交通碰撞(rtc)受害者的伤害严重程度评分(ISS)的影响,包括直接影响和通过院前时间(PHT)影响。巴基斯坦卡拉奇道路交通伤害研究和预防中心(RTIRPC)汇编的298,654起车祸数据用于分析。由于响应变量(PHT和ISS)的角解分布,通过合成数据生成计算缺失值后,估计了两个Tobit回归模型。这些模型的边际效应用于路径分析。调查结果表明,随着PHT增加一个单位,国际空间站增加0.01个单位,突出表明迫切需要将坠机受害者迅速后送至医疗设施。撤离方式成为一个关键因素,与私人或公共交通相比,救护车造成的初级保健费用和紧急服务费用增加,这突出表明需要改进以救护车为基础的专用应急反应。PHT和ISS在夜间坠机中较高,因此需要在夜间提供更好的紧急医疗服务(EMS)。交叉路口碰撞与较低的PHT和ISS相关;而在未分割的道路上以及涉及多辆或大型车辆的交通事故则增加了PHT和ISS。路径分析显示,一些关键变量对国际空间站的总体影响高于它们的直接影响——如果没有路径分析,这是无法探索的。这些见解可以帮助决策者制定战略,以改善应急反应和道路安全,最终减少与rtc相关的伤亡人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信