Yunwei Li , Siyu Wu , Anran Wang , Lan Yang , Hong Wang , Jun Li , Chaosheng Huang
{"title":"High-dimensional functional boundaries search for deviation-robust testing of autonomous driving system","authors":"Yunwei Li , Siyu Wu , Anran Wang , Lan Yang , Hong Wang , Jun Li , Chaosheng Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Testing and evaluation are essential for verifying the safety of the intended function (SOTIF) of autonomous driving systems (ADS), which focuses on estimating the system’s functional boundaries through a limited set of tests to assess its safe operational range. To achieve this, a series of valuable safety-margin scenarios must be designed as test cases. However, scenario testing faces the dilemma of the curse of dimensionality and the requirements for test coverage. Consequently, the construction and selection of test cases become significant challenges. Moreover, due to the black-box nature of the system under test (SUT), surrogate models are often introduced during the scenario generation process, which can introduce model deviation relative to the actual system and potentially lead to ineffective test scenarios as well as incorrect estimation of system functional boundaries (SFB). To address these challenges, an efficient framework for generating high-dimensional safety-margin scenarios and tracking SFB of SUT is proposed, which utilizes a baseline surrogate model to generate a diverse and comprehensive library of safety-margin test scenarios through a multi-population genetic algorithm (MPGA). Additionally, a System Functional Boundary Tracking (SFBT) module is employed to compensate for the deviation between the baseline surrogate model and the actual SUT, thereby adaptively generalizing the library of critical scenarios to estimate its high-dimensional functional boundaries. This framework will potentially assist in the testing and validation of the Operational Design Domain (ODD) for ADS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108156"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525002428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Testing and evaluation are essential for verifying the safety of the intended function (SOTIF) of autonomous driving systems (ADS), which focuses on estimating the system’s functional boundaries through a limited set of tests to assess its safe operational range. To achieve this, a series of valuable safety-margin scenarios must be designed as test cases. However, scenario testing faces the dilemma of the curse of dimensionality and the requirements for test coverage. Consequently, the construction and selection of test cases become significant challenges. Moreover, due to the black-box nature of the system under test (SUT), surrogate models are often introduced during the scenario generation process, which can introduce model deviation relative to the actual system and potentially lead to ineffective test scenarios as well as incorrect estimation of system functional boundaries (SFB). To address these challenges, an efficient framework for generating high-dimensional safety-margin scenarios and tracking SFB of SUT is proposed, which utilizes a baseline surrogate model to generate a diverse and comprehensive library of safety-margin test scenarios through a multi-population genetic algorithm (MPGA). Additionally, a System Functional Boundary Tracking (SFBT) module is employed to compensate for the deviation between the baseline surrogate model and the actual SUT, thereby adaptively generalizing the library of critical scenarios to estimate its high-dimensional functional boundaries. This framework will potentially assist in the testing and validation of the Operational Design Domain (ODD) for ADS.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.