Critical ignoring when information abundance is detrimental to democracy

IF 6.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Stephan Lewandowsky , Ralph Hertwig
{"title":"Critical ignoring when information abundance is detrimental to democracy","authors":"Stephan Lewandowsky ,&nbsp;Ralph Hertwig","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We live in a world of democratic backsliding, and simultaneously, in a world of information abundance. Initial expectations that the access to vast amounts of information provided by the Internet will facilitate democracy have been disappointed. We highlight how information abundance can be detrimental to democracy, from triggering misinformation cascades to generating coping strategies that result in reduced political accountability. We propose that information abundance is best met through critical ignoring; that is, the strategic decision not to consume certain content. We present new techniques of critical ignoring that permit people not only to cope with information abundance but also to avoid contributing to democratic decline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102128"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We live in a world of democratic backsliding, and simultaneously, in a world of information abundance. Initial expectations that the access to vast amounts of information provided by the Internet will facilitate democracy have been disappointed. We highlight how information abundance can be detrimental to democracy, from triggering misinformation cascades to generating coping strategies that result in reduced political accountability. We propose that information abundance is best met through critical ignoring; that is, the strategic decision not to consume certain content. We present new techniques of critical ignoring that permit people not only to cope with information abundance but also to avoid contributing to democratic decline.
当信息丰富时,关键的忽视对民主是有害的
我们生活在一个民主倒退的世界,同时也生活在一个信息丰富的世界。人们最初期望互联网提供的大量信息将促进民主,但这一期望落空了。我们强调信息丰富如何对民主有害,从引发错误信息的连锁反应到产生导致政治问责制减少的应对策略。我们认为,信息丰富的最好方式是通过临界忽略来实现;也就是说,不消费某些内容的战略决策。我们提出了批判性忽视的新技术,使人们不仅能够应对信息的丰富,而且避免助长民主的衰落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信