Han Li , Huijie Li , Guangpeng Dong , Min Min , Bingcheng Si , Changhong Miao , Jingjing Jin , Guangjie Chen , Hao Feng
{"title":"Rooting depth governs groundwater recharge in agroforestry systems: Implications for water sustainability under dryland afforestation","authors":"Han Li , Huijie Li , Guangpeng Dong , Min Min , Bingcheng Si , Changhong Miao , Jingjing Jin , Guangjie Chen , Hao Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In dryland agroforestry systems, large-scale afforestation for ecological restoration often compromises groundwater sustainability, yet the roles of tree species traits (e.g., rooting depth) and soil-vegetation interactions remains unclear. We conducted a field study on the Loess Plateau, comparing 14 deep-rooted afforestation species (13 trees, 1 shrub) with adjacent shallow-rooted crops (maize, wheat, millet, etc.) across 32 paired sites. Using soil water profiling, root mapping, and tritium tracing, we found that deep rooting (4.8–28 m) reduced soil water storage by 0–2131 mm and groundwater recharge by at least 67.2 % compared to shallow-rooted vegetation. Rooting depth explained 72 % of recharge variation, outperforming climate and soil factors. Moreover, the adverse effect of rooting depth on recharge was strongly modulated by soil texture, as coarser-textured soils weaken this impact by enhancing deep percolation. These findings provide a scientific basis for selecting low-water-demand tree species (e.g., shallow-rooted <em>Ziziphus jujuba</em>) to maintain groundwater recharge in dryland agroforestry systems. Our results quantify the trade-off between afforestation goals and groundwater security, offering actionable insights for climate-smart land-use planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"662 ","pages":"Article 134072"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425014106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In dryland agroforestry systems, large-scale afforestation for ecological restoration often compromises groundwater sustainability, yet the roles of tree species traits (e.g., rooting depth) and soil-vegetation interactions remains unclear. We conducted a field study on the Loess Plateau, comparing 14 deep-rooted afforestation species (13 trees, 1 shrub) with adjacent shallow-rooted crops (maize, wheat, millet, etc.) across 32 paired sites. Using soil water profiling, root mapping, and tritium tracing, we found that deep rooting (4.8–28 m) reduced soil water storage by 0–2131 mm and groundwater recharge by at least 67.2 % compared to shallow-rooted vegetation. Rooting depth explained 72 % of recharge variation, outperforming climate and soil factors. Moreover, the adverse effect of rooting depth on recharge was strongly modulated by soil texture, as coarser-textured soils weaken this impact by enhancing deep percolation. These findings provide a scientific basis for selecting low-water-demand tree species (e.g., shallow-rooted Ziziphus jujuba) to maintain groundwater recharge in dryland agroforestry systems. Our results quantify the trade-off between afforestation goals and groundwater security, offering actionable insights for climate-smart land-use planning.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.