I do not feel your pain: Exploring the impact of state empathy on placebo and nocebo effects evoked by observational learning

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stefanie H. Meeuwis , Joanna Kłosowska , Aleksandra Budzisz , Amelia Jankowska , Daryna Rubanets , Julia Badzińska , Elżbieta A. Bajcar , Przemysław Bąbel
{"title":"I do not feel your pain: Exploring the impact of state empathy on placebo and nocebo effects evoked by observational learning","authors":"Stefanie H. Meeuwis ,&nbsp;Joanna Kłosowska ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Budzisz ,&nbsp;Amelia Jankowska ,&nbsp;Daryna Rubanets ,&nbsp;Julia Badzińska ,&nbsp;Elżbieta A. Bajcar ,&nbsp;Przemysław Bąbel","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Observational learning (OBL) can elicit placebo hypoalgesia or nocebo hyperalgesia if pain relief or exacerbation is observed after placebo administration. While dispositional empathy has occasionally been associated with increased placebo and nocebo responding, the contribution of situational empathy remains elusive. This study addresses this gap using a validated experimental paradigm. Healthy individuals (n=180, 60% females) were randomized to four experimental (placebo-OBL, high-empathy placebo-OBL, nocebo-OBL, high-empathy nocebo-OBL) or two control groups (random-ratings OBL, no-observation). Medium pain was evoked at baseline and post-OBL with heat stimuli to both arms. Before OBL, a placebo ointment was applied to one arm. In the experimental groups, participants observed a model expressing hypoalgesia or hyperalgesia in reaction to the ointment. In the empathy groups, participants were instructed to empathize with the model. OBL did not alter pain intensity (F(3,176)=1.02, <em>p</em>=.39, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup>=.02), although pain expectations changed in the expected direction (F(5.76,337.84)=5.81, <em>p</em>&lt;.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup>=.09). There were no between-group differences in situational empathy (indicating a failed empathy manipulation), and the magnitude of placebo hypoalgesia, or nocebo hyperalgesia (all <em>p</em>’s≥.19). The current study is one of only a few highlighting the limits of OBL-induced placebo and nocebo effects. It suggests that changing expectations alone may not always be sufficient to produce changes in pain perception. Potential factors explaining these findings, including attention and cognitive load, are discussed. Increasing our understanding of OBL-induced pain changes can support the development of interventions for (chronic) pain. Studying the contribution of empathic processes may be particularly relevant given their vital role in human interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This article presents the results of an experimental mixed-model study on state empathy and placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia, induced by observational learning (OBL). Although expectations changed, empathy and OBL did not elicit any changes in the experience of pain. The findings highlight the limits of OBL for altering pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 105526"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational learning (OBL) can elicit placebo hypoalgesia or nocebo hyperalgesia if pain relief or exacerbation is observed after placebo administration. While dispositional empathy has occasionally been associated with increased placebo and nocebo responding, the contribution of situational empathy remains elusive. This study addresses this gap using a validated experimental paradigm. Healthy individuals (n=180, 60% females) were randomized to four experimental (placebo-OBL, high-empathy placebo-OBL, nocebo-OBL, high-empathy nocebo-OBL) or two control groups (random-ratings OBL, no-observation). Medium pain was evoked at baseline and post-OBL with heat stimuli to both arms. Before OBL, a placebo ointment was applied to one arm. In the experimental groups, participants observed a model expressing hypoalgesia or hyperalgesia in reaction to the ointment. In the empathy groups, participants were instructed to empathize with the model. OBL did not alter pain intensity (F(3,176)=1.02, p=.39, ηp2=.02), although pain expectations changed in the expected direction (F(5.76,337.84)=5.81, p<.001, ηp2=.09). There were no between-group differences in situational empathy (indicating a failed empathy manipulation), and the magnitude of placebo hypoalgesia, or nocebo hyperalgesia (all p’s≥.19). The current study is one of only a few highlighting the limits of OBL-induced placebo and nocebo effects. It suggests that changing expectations alone may not always be sufficient to produce changes in pain perception. Potential factors explaining these findings, including attention and cognitive load, are discussed. Increasing our understanding of OBL-induced pain changes can support the development of interventions for (chronic) pain. Studying the contribution of empathic processes may be particularly relevant given their vital role in human interactions.

Perspective

This article presents the results of an experimental mixed-model study on state empathy and placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia, induced by observational learning (OBL). Although expectations changed, empathy and OBL did not elicit any changes in the experience of pain. The findings highlight the limits of OBL for altering pain.
我感觉不到你的痛苦:探索状态共情对观察学习诱发的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的影响
观察性学习(OBL)可以引起安慰剂镇痛或反安慰剂镇痛,如果疼痛缓解或加剧观察安慰剂服用后。虽然性格共情偶尔与安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的增加有关,但情境共情的作用仍然难以捉摸。本研究使用一个经过验证的实验范式来解决这一差距。健康个体(n=180, 60%为女性)被随机分为4个实验组(安慰剂-OBL、高同理心安慰剂-OBL、反安慰剂-OBL、高同理心反安慰剂-OBL)或2个对照组(随机评分OBL,无观察)。在基线和obl后,用热刺激双臂引起中度疼痛。在OBL之前,在一只手臂上涂抹安慰剂软膏。在实验组中,参与者观察到对软膏反应表达痛觉减退或痛觉过敏的模型。在移情组中,参与者被要求对模型产生移情。OBL未改变疼痛强度(F(3176)=1.02, p=。39, ηp2= 0.02),尽管疼痛预期在预期方向变化(F(5.76,337.84)=5.81, p<;001年,ηp2 = .09点)。情境共情(表明共情操作失败)和安慰剂痛觉不足或反安慰剂痛觉过度程度在组间无差异(p均≥0.19)。目前的研究是少数几项强调obl诱导的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应局限性的研究之一。这表明,仅仅改变期望可能并不总是足以产生疼痛感知的变化。讨论了解释这些发现的潜在因素,包括注意力和认知负荷。增加我们对obl引起的疼痛变化的理解可以支持(慢性)疼痛干预措施的发展。考虑到移情过程在人类互动中的重要作用,研究移情过程的贡献可能尤为重要。本文介绍了一项由观察学习(OBL)诱导的状态共情和安慰剂痛觉减退和反安慰剂痛觉过敏的实验混合模型研究的结果。虽然期望改变了,但共情和OBL并没有引起疼痛体验的任何变化。研究结果强调了OBL在改变疼痛方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信