Stefanie H. Meeuwis , Joanna Kłosowska , Aleksandra Budzisz , Amelia Jankowska , Daryna Rubanets , Julia Badzińska , Elżbieta A. Bajcar , Przemysław Bąbel
{"title":"I do not feel your pain: Exploring the impact of state empathy on placebo and nocebo effects evoked by observational learning","authors":"Stefanie H. Meeuwis , Joanna Kłosowska , Aleksandra Budzisz , Amelia Jankowska , Daryna Rubanets , Julia Badzińska , Elżbieta A. Bajcar , Przemysław Bąbel","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Observational learning (OBL) can elicit placebo hypoalgesia or nocebo hyperalgesia if pain relief or exacerbation is observed after placebo administration. While dispositional empathy has occasionally been associated with increased placebo and nocebo responding, the contribution of situational empathy remains elusive. This study addresses this gap using a validated experimental paradigm. Healthy individuals (n=180, 60% females) were randomized to four experimental (placebo-OBL, high-empathy placebo-OBL, nocebo-OBL, high-empathy nocebo-OBL) or two control groups (random-ratings OBL, no-observation). Medium pain was evoked at baseline and post-OBL with heat stimuli to both arms. Before OBL, a placebo ointment was applied to one arm. In the experimental groups, participants observed a model expressing hypoalgesia or hyperalgesia in reaction to the ointment. In the empathy groups, participants were instructed to empathize with the model. OBL did not alter pain intensity (F(3,176)=1.02, <em>p</em>=.39, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup>=.02), although pain expectations changed in the expected direction (F(5.76,337.84)=5.81, <em>p</em><.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup>=.09). There were no between-group differences in situational empathy (indicating a failed empathy manipulation), and the magnitude of placebo hypoalgesia, or nocebo hyperalgesia (all <em>p</em>’s≥.19). The current study is one of only a few highlighting the limits of OBL-induced placebo and nocebo effects. It suggests that changing expectations alone may not always be sufficient to produce changes in pain perception. Potential factors explaining these findings, including attention and cognitive load, are discussed. Increasing our understanding of OBL-induced pain changes can support the development of interventions for (chronic) pain. Studying the contribution of empathic processes may be particularly relevant given their vital role in human interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>This article presents the results of an experimental mixed-model study on state empathy and placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia, induced by observational learning (OBL). Although expectations changed, empathy and OBL did not elicit any changes in the experience of pain. The findings highlight the limits of OBL for altering pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 105526"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Observational learning (OBL) can elicit placebo hypoalgesia or nocebo hyperalgesia if pain relief or exacerbation is observed after placebo administration. While dispositional empathy has occasionally been associated with increased placebo and nocebo responding, the contribution of situational empathy remains elusive. This study addresses this gap using a validated experimental paradigm. Healthy individuals (n=180, 60% females) were randomized to four experimental (placebo-OBL, high-empathy placebo-OBL, nocebo-OBL, high-empathy nocebo-OBL) or two control groups (random-ratings OBL, no-observation). Medium pain was evoked at baseline and post-OBL with heat stimuli to both arms. Before OBL, a placebo ointment was applied to one arm. In the experimental groups, participants observed a model expressing hypoalgesia or hyperalgesia in reaction to the ointment. In the empathy groups, participants were instructed to empathize with the model. OBL did not alter pain intensity (F(3,176)=1.02, p=.39, ηp2=.02), although pain expectations changed in the expected direction (F(5.76,337.84)=5.81, p<.001, ηp2=.09). There were no between-group differences in situational empathy (indicating a failed empathy manipulation), and the magnitude of placebo hypoalgesia, or nocebo hyperalgesia (all p’s≥.19). The current study is one of only a few highlighting the limits of OBL-induced placebo and nocebo effects. It suggests that changing expectations alone may not always be sufficient to produce changes in pain perception. Potential factors explaining these findings, including attention and cognitive load, are discussed. Increasing our understanding of OBL-induced pain changes can support the development of interventions for (chronic) pain. Studying the contribution of empathic processes may be particularly relevant given their vital role in human interactions.
Perspective
This article presents the results of an experimental mixed-model study on state empathy and placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia, induced by observational learning (OBL). Although expectations changed, empathy and OBL did not elicit any changes in the experience of pain. The findings highlight the limits of OBL for altering pain.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.