Optimal investment strategy for natural hydrogen exploration and production considering dual price uncertainties: A real options approach

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Saedaseul Moon , Deok-Joo Lee
{"title":"Optimal investment strategy for natural hydrogen exploration and production considering dual price uncertainties: A real options approach","authors":"Saedaseul Moon ,&nbsp;Deok-Joo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a real options framework to assess the economic viability of natural hydrogen exploration and production. Unlike conventional oil and gas projects, natural hydrogen faces dual uncertainties in electricity and Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) prices, highlighting the importance of managerial flexibility in investment decisions. Drawing on global average oil and gas data as a proxy, the model evaluates optimal timing to invest, defer, or abandon until the license expiration. Results show that power generation efficiency is the most influential factor, followed by REC- and electricity-related parameters. Compared to scenarios without incentives, the presence of REC subsidies significantly boosts both the likelihood and value of investment. Sensitivity analyses further underscore how field size, price volatility, and policy frameworks (e.g., license duration, subsidy structures) shape project outcomes. These findings highlight the need to integrate geological, economic, and policy dimensions to fully unlock the commercial potential of natural hydrogen, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 105697"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops a real options framework to assess the economic viability of natural hydrogen exploration and production. Unlike conventional oil and gas projects, natural hydrogen faces dual uncertainties in electricity and Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) prices, highlighting the importance of managerial flexibility in investment decisions. Drawing on global average oil and gas data as a proxy, the model evaluates optimal timing to invest, defer, or abandon until the license expiration. Results show that power generation efficiency is the most influential factor, followed by REC- and electricity-related parameters. Compared to scenarios without incentives, the presence of REC subsidies significantly boosts both the likelihood and value of investment. Sensitivity analyses further underscore how field size, price volatility, and policy frameworks (e.g., license duration, subsidy structures) shape project outcomes. These findings highlight the need to integrate geological, economic, and policy dimensions to fully unlock the commercial potential of natural hydrogen, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders.
考虑双重价格不确定性的天然氢勘探和生产最优投资策略:实物期权方法
本研究开发了一个真实期权框架来评估天然氢勘探和生产的经济可行性。与传统油气项目不同,天然氢面临电力和可再生能源证书(REC)价格的双重不确定性,这凸显了投资决策中管理灵活性的重要性。该模型利用全球平均油气数据作为代理,评估投资、推迟或放弃的最佳时机,直到许可证到期。结果表明,发电效率是影响发电效率的主要因素,其次是REC和电力相关参数。与没有激励的情况相比,REC补贴的存在显著提高了投资的可能性和价值。敏感性分析进一步强调了油田规模、价格波动和政策框架(如许可期限、补贴结构)如何影响项目成果。这些发现强调了整合地质、经济和政策维度以充分释放天然氢的商业潜力的必要性,为政策制定者和行业利益相关者提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信