{"title":"Optimal investment strategy for natural hydrogen exploration and production considering dual price uncertainties: A real options approach","authors":"Saedaseul Moon , Deok-Joo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a real options framework to assess the economic viability of natural hydrogen exploration and production. Unlike conventional oil and gas projects, natural hydrogen faces dual uncertainties in electricity and Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) prices, highlighting the importance of managerial flexibility in investment decisions. Drawing on global average oil and gas data as a proxy, the model evaluates optimal timing to invest, defer, or abandon until the license expiration. Results show that power generation efficiency is the most influential factor, followed by REC- and electricity-related parameters. Compared to scenarios without incentives, the presence of REC subsidies significantly boosts both the likelihood and value of investment. Sensitivity analyses further underscore how field size, price volatility, and policy frameworks (e.g., license duration, subsidy structures) shape project outcomes. These findings highlight the need to integrate geological, economic, and policy dimensions to fully unlock the commercial potential of natural hydrogen, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 105697"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study develops a real options framework to assess the economic viability of natural hydrogen exploration and production. Unlike conventional oil and gas projects, natural hydrogen faces dual uncertainties in electricity and Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) prices, highlighting the importance of managerial flexibility in investment decisions. Drawing on global average oil and gas data as a proxy, the model evaluates optimal timing to invest, defer, or abandon until the license expiration. Results show that power generation efficiency is the most influential factor, followed by REC- and electricity-related parameters. Compared to scenarios without incentives, the presence of REC subsidies significantly boosts both the likelihood and value of investment. Sensitivity analyses further underscore how field size, price volatility, and policy frameworks (e.g., license duration, subsidy structures) shape project outcomes. These findings highlight the need to integrate geological, economic, and policy dimensions to fully unlock the commercial potential of natural hydrogen, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.