{"title":"Media approval and CSP–CFP translation: the role of institutional development in an emerging market","authors":"Liang Wen , Jing Yu Yang , Wen Helena Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building on stakeholder theory, this study examines media approval as a critical yet underexplored mechanism facilitating the translation of corporate social performance (CSP) into corporate financial performance (CFP) in emerging market firms (EMFs). We develop a framework to explore how media approval functions as an influential intermediary by shaping stakeholder perceptions and fostering reciprocity. Specifically, we posit that while CSP enhances media approval, this effect diminishes at higher levels of CSP. In turn, media approval positively mediates the CSP–CFP relationship. Given the weak institutional environments in which EMFs operate, we further theorize that the effectiveness of media approval as an intermediary depends on the levels of regional institutional development. In regions with higher institutional development, stakeholders have access to alternative sources of credible information, reducing their reliance on media narratives and thereby weakening the mediation effect of media approval in the CSP–CFP translation. Employing generalized least squares estimation and several robustness analyses, we analyzed a panel dataset of 2,008 publicly listed Chinese firms from 2010 to 2019. Our findings provide strong support for our hypotheses, highlighting the context-dependent role of media in CSP-driven financial outcomes and the strategic significance of media approval in shaping stakeholder dynamics in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115636"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500459X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Building on stakeholder theory, this study examines media approval as a critical yet underexplored mechanism facilitating the translation of corporate social performance (CSP) into corporate financial performance (CFP) in emerging market firms (EMFs). We develop a framework to explore how media approval functions as an influential intermediary by shaping stakeholder perceptions and fostering reciprocity. Specifically, we posit that while CSP enhances media approval, this effect diminishes at higher levels of CSP. In turn, media approval positively mediates the CSP–CFP relationship. Given the weak institutional environments in which EMFs operate, we further theorize that the effectiveness of media approval as an intermediary depends on the levels of regional institutional development. In regions with higher institutional development, stakeholders have access to alternative sources of credible information, reducing their reliance on media narratives and thereby weakening the mediation effect of media approval in the CSP–CFP translation. Employing generalized least squares estimation and several robustness analyses, we analyzed a panel dataset of 2,008 publicly listed Chinese firms from 2010 to 2019. Our findings provide strong support for our hypotheses, highlighting the context-dependent role of media in CSP-driven financial outcomes and the strategic significance of media approval in shaping stakeholder dynamics in emerging markets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.