Eugénie Lambrecht , Jakob Struye , David Beckwée , Luc Vereeck , Willem De Hertogh , Elissa Embrechts , Ann Hallemans
{"title":"Standardizing head movements in gait assessment through augmented reality, a cross-sectional study","authors":"Eugénie Lambrecht , Jakob Struye , David Beckwée , Luc Vereeck , Willem De Hertogh , Elissa Embrechts , Ann Hallemans","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Head movements challenge human balance during locomotion, but their exact impact remains unclear due to non-standardized experimental setups. This study validates an augmented reality (AR) cueing setup for head movements during gait assessment, investigating its task performance accuracy, hardware impact, ability for standardization and the effects of head movements on gait.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional study, 25 healthy adults underwent a 3D-motion capture gait protocol. Participants walked overground under three conditions: 1) auditory-cued head turns wearing a headband, 2) auditory-cued head turns wearing an AR head mounted display (AR-HMD), 3) AR-cued (hologram) head turns wearing AR-HMD. Head kinematics (angles and velocity) and eye movements were recorded during horizontal and vertical head movements. Task performance accuracy was measured as the coherency (gain,%) in head and eye with the hologram. Hardware impact on head kinematics was assessed using linear mixed models. Standardization of an AR-HMD versus traditional auditory cueing was measured by head kinematics variance and kinematic profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Task performance accuracy was high (eyes-hologram: 99.5 ± 0.8 %; head-hologram 98.8 ± 1.6 %). Hardware impacted angular head velocity (p < 0.001) but not range of motion (p = 0.700). Standardization of the head movement was better in AR with lower variances in kinematic profiles, standard deviations (p < 0.05) and coefficients of variance (p > 0.05) compared to auditory cueing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, an AR-HMD setup elicits more standardized head movements shown by lower variance in head kinematics with excellent task performance accuracy. This offers a proof of concept for AR elicited head movements as a method in gait assessment in healthy individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"122 ","pages":"Pages 292-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225005983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Head movements challenge human balance during locomotion, but their exact impact remains unclear due to non-standardized experimental setups. This study validates an augmented reality (AR) cueing setup for head movements during gait assessment, investigating its task performance accuracy, hardware impact, ability for standardization and the effects of head movements on gait.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, 25 healthy adults underwent a 3D-motion capture gait protocol. Participants walked overground under three conditions: 1) auditory-cued head turns wearing a headband, 2) auditory-cued head turns wearing an AR head mounted display (AR-HMD), 3) AR-cued (hologram) head turns wearing AR-HMD. Head kinematics (angles and velocity) and eye movements were recorded during horizontal and vertical head movements. Task performance accuracy was measured as the coherency (gain,%) in head and eye with the hologram. Hardware impact on head kinematics was assessed using linear mixed models. Standardization of an AR-HMD versus traditional auditory cueing was measured by head kinematics variance and kinematic profiles.
Results
Task performance accuracy was high (eyes-hologram: 99.5 ± 0.8 %; head-hologram 98.8 ± 1.6 %). Hardware impacted angular head velocity (p < 0.001) but not range of motion (p = 0.700). Standardization of the head movement was better in AR with lower variances in kinematic profiles, standard deviations (p < 0.05) and coefficients of variance (p > 0.05) compared to auditory cueing.
Conclusion
In conclusion, an AR-HMD setup elicits more standardized head movements shown by lower variance in head kinematics with excellent task performance accuracy. This offers a proof of concept for AR elicited head movements as a method in gait assessment in healthy individuals.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.