Examining engagement orientations and learning profiles of older adult learners in technology-enhanced environments through the lens of cognitive dissonance theory

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Ya-Ling Wang
{"title":"Examining engagement orientations and learning profiles of older adult learners in technology-enhanced environments through the lens of cognitive dissonance theory","authors":"Ya-Ling Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study utilizes Cognitive Dissonance Theory to investigate engagement orientations and learning profiles among 370 elderly learners in Taiwan within technology-enhanced environments. Participants were categorized into four distinct profiles—Eager, Conflicted, Indifferent, and Reluctant—based on their inclination to engage with or avoid technology using an approach-avoidance matrix. Factors like digital experience, educational background, and age were assessed to correlate with engagement orientations. Using cluster analysis and MANOVA, the study examines how age, education, and digital experience influence these profiles and overall engagement. Findings reveal that personal attributes significantly impact engagement orientations, with higher education and digital experience correlating with more proactive profiles. Tailoring interventions to these profiles can enhance the efficacy and satisfaction of older adults' learning experiences in digital settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101945"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125001944","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study utilizes Cognitive Dissonance Theory to investigate engagement orientations and learning profiles among 370 elderly learners in Taiwan within technology-enhanced environments. Participants were categorized into four distinct profiles—Eager, Conflicted, Indifferent, and Reluctant—based on their inclination to engage with or avoid technology using an approach-avoidance matrix. Factors like digital experience, educational background, and age were assessed to correlate with engagement orientations. Using cluster analysis and MANOVA, the study examines how age, education, and digital experience influence these profiles and overall engagement. Findings reveal that personal attributes significantly impact engagement orientations, with higher education and digital experience correlating with more proactive profiles. Tailoring interventions to these profiles can enhance the efficacy and satisfaction of older adults' learning experiences in digital settings.
通过认知失调理论的视角研究技术增强环境中老年成人学习者的参与取向和学习概况
本研究运用认知失调理论,探讨370名台湾老年学习者在科技提升环境下的投入倾向与学习概况。参与者被分为四种不同的类型——渴望、冲突、冷漠和不情愿——基于他们使用方法回避矩阵来接触或避免技术的倾向。研究人员评估了数字体验、教育背景和年龄等因素与参与取向的相关性。利用聚类分析和方差分析,该研究考察了年龄、教育程度和数字体验如何影响这些个人资料和整体参与度。研究结果显示,个人属性显著影响敬业度取向,高等教育和数字经验与更积极主动的形象相关。根据这些情况量身定制干预措施可以提高老年人在数字环境中学习经验的有效性和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信