Navneet , Madhu Sharma , Lisa Duizer , Iris J. Joye
{"title":"Evaluation of the performance of physically processed bean flours in gluten-free cake production","authors":"Navneet , Madhu Sharma , Lisa Duizer , Iris J. Joye","doi":"10.1016/j.foostr.2025.100456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Performance of physically processed bean flours was evaluated in gluten-free cake production. Cakes prepared using unprocessed, dry heat (DH) treated, extruded and high pressure processed (HPP) bean flours were compared with chlorinated wheat flour cakes using instrumental and sensory analysis. Cake characteristics were related to differences in the content and structural makeup of starch and protein in flours. RVA testing in sucrose solution was explored as a quick and effective way to assess structure development potential of bean flour for cakes. Notably, DH bean flour contained intact starch granules embedded in a modified protein matrix and developed the highest viscosity in sucrose solution upon hydrothermal treatment. Cakes prepared using DH bean flour, therefore, were closer in structure to chlorinated wheat flour cakes. Instrumental analysis depicted that all bean flour cakes were darker, harder, less cohesive and inferior in terms of their pore structure to chlorinated wheat flour cakes. Sensory analysis showed that all bean flour cakes were significantly different from chlorinated wheat flour cake in appearance, flavour and texture. Although the processed bean flour cakes differed evidently from the chlorinated wheat flour cake, this study showed that physical processing of bean flour improved its functionality in gluten-free cake production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48640,"journal":{"name":"Food Structure-Netherlands","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100456"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Structure-Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213329125000516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Performance of physically processed bean flours was evaluated in gluten-free cake production. Cakes prepared using unprocessed, dry heat (DH) treated, extruded and high pressure processed (HPP) bean flours were compared with chlorinated wheat flour cakes using instrumental and sensory analysis. Cake characteristics were related to differences in the content and structural makeup of starch and protein in flours. RVA testing in sucrose solution was explored as a quick and effective way to assess structure development potential of bean flour for cakes. Notably, DH bean flour contained intact starch granules embedded in a modified protein matrix and developed the highest viscosity in sucrose solution upon hydrothermal treatment. Cakes prepared using DH bean flour, therefore, were closer in structure to chlorinated wheat flour cakes. Instrumental analysis depicted that all bean flour cakes were darker, harder, less cohesive and inferior in terms of their pore structure to chlorinated wheat flour cakes. Sensory analysis showed that all bean flour cakes were significantly different from chlorinated wheat flour cake in appearance, flavour and texture. Although the processed bean flour cakes differed evidently from the chlorinated wheat flour cake, this study showed that physical processing of bean flour improved its functionality in gluten-free cake production.
期刊介绍:
Food Structure is the premier international forum devoted to the publication of high-quality original research on food structure. The focus of this journal is on food structure in the context of its relationship with molecular composition, processing and macroscopic properties (e.g., shelf stability, sensory properties, etc.). Manuscripts that only report qualitative findings and micrographs and that lack sound hypothesis-driven, quantitative structure-function research are not accepted. Significance of the research findings for the food science community and/or industry must also be highlighted.