A place-based approach to measuring a just transition: Evidence from the north-east of Scotland

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Daria Shapovalova, Keith A. Bender, John Bone, Tavis Potts
{"title":"A place-based approach to measuring a just transition: Evidence from the north-east of Scotland","authors":"Daria Shapovalova,&nbsp;Keith A. Bender,&nbsp;John Bone,&nbsp;Tavis Potts","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition to sustainable energy systems necessitates not only technological but also societal transformations. For countries shifting away from fossil fuel production, Just Transition has become a central concept for planning and action. With many countries adopting Just Transition platforms, its operationalisation and measurement pose challenges, largely stemming from a lack of proven methodologies and complexity of social, economic and environmental data, as well as the diversity of stakeholder perspectives and narratives on contested futures. In this paper, we critically review the existing approaches for measuring Just Transition, challenges in indicator selection, implementation, and assessment. This paper presents a novel approach to developing principles for method and indicator selection for place-based measurement of Just Transition. We explore theoretical frameworks guiding indicator selection and the implications of different conceptualisations of Just Transition. We explore a case study of North East of Scotland (Aberdeen and its wider region) hosting the UK's oil and gas industry to illustrate how participatory research can be used to develop a place-based approach to transition measurement, emphasising the importance of community engagement and multi-stakeholder dialogue. Our findings underscore the importance of holistic, context-specific approaches to measuring Just Transition that evaluate jobs and skills, poverty and wellbeing, community revitalisation and participatory democracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104236"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition to sustainable energy systems necessitates not only technological but also societal transformations. For countries shifting away from fossil fuel production, Just Transition has become a central concept for planning and action. With many countries adopting Just Transition platforms, its operationalisation and measurement pose challenges, largely stemming from a lack of proven methodologies and complexity of social, economic and environmental data, as well as the diversity of stakeholder perspectives and narratives on contested futures. In this paper, we critically review the existing approaches for measuring Just Transition, challenges in indicator selection, implementation, and assessment. This paper presents a novel approach to developing principles for method and indicator selection for place-based measurement of Just Transition. We explore theoretical frameworks guiding indicator selection and the implications of different conceptualisations of Just Transition. We explore a case study of North East of Scotland (Aberdeen and its wider region) hosting the UK's oil and gas industry to illustrate how participatory research can be used to develop a place-based approach to transition measurement, emphasising the importance of community engagement and multi-stakeholder dialogue. Our findings underscore the importance of holistic, context-specific approaches to measuring Just Transition that evaluate jobs and skills, poverty and wellbeing, community revitalisation and participatory democracy.
衡量公正过渡的基于地点的方法:来自苏格兰东北部的证据
向可持续能源系统的过渡不仅需要技术变革,也需要社会变革。对于正在摆脱化石燃料生产的国家来说,“公正转型”已成为规划和行动的核心概念。随着许多国家采用公正转型平台,其运作和测量带来了挑战,主要源于缺乏经过验证的方法和社会、经济和环境数据的复杂性,以及利益相关者对有争议的未来的观点和叙述的多样性。在本文中,我们批判性地回顾了衡量公正转型的现有方法,以及指标选择、实施和评估方面的挑战。本文提出了一种基于地点的Just Transition测量方法和指标选择原则的新思路。我们探讨了指导指标选择的理论框架和公正转型不同概念的含义。我们探讨了苏格兰东北部(阿伯丁及其更广泛的地区)主持英国石油和天然气行业的案例研究,以说明如何使用参与式研究来开发基于地点的过渡测量方法,强调社区参与和多方利益相关者对话的重要性。我们的研究结果强调了评估就业和技能、贫困和福祉、社区振兴和参与式民主的整体、具体情况的方法对衡量公正转型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信