Elementary teachers' conceptualizations of classroom discussions across content areas: An epistemic network analysis

IF 3.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sarah Schneider Kavanagh , Sam Prough , Amy Guillotte , Annie G. Wilhelm , Lynsey K. Gibbons , Eve Manz
{"title":"Elementary teachers' conceptualizations of classroom discussions across content areas: An epistemic network analysis","authors":"Sarah Schneider Kavanagh ,&nbsp;Sam Prough ,&nbsp;Amy Guillotte ,&nbsp;Annie G. Wilhelm ,&nbsp;Lynsey K. Gibbons ,&nbsp;Eve Manz","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2025.105173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores how elementary teachers understand the purpose and practice of classroom discussion across English language arts (ELA) and mathematics. Research suggests that classroom discussions have a positive impact on student engagement, critical thinking, and conceptual understanding. Furthermore, studies have illuminated the interconnectedness between how teachers think about discussions and how they lead them. Using epistemic network analysis, this article investigates variations between how elementary teachers conceptualize classroom discussion in different content areas. Findings suggest that teachers' conceptualizations of high-quality discussion differ across ELA and mathematics. Understanding these variations may help both researchers and professional development providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 105173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X25002501","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how elementary teachers understand the purpose and practice of classroom discussion across English language arts (ELA) and mathematics. Research suggests that classroom discussions have a positive impact on student engagement, critical thinking, and conceptual understanding. Furthermore, studies have illuminated the interconnectedness between how teachers think about discussions and how they lead them. Using epistemic network analysis, this article investigates variations between how elementary teachers conceptualize classroom discussion in different content areas. Findings suggest that teachers' conceptualizations of high-quality discussion differ across ELA and mathematics. Understanding these variations may help both researchers and professional development providers.
小学教师对跨内容领域课堂讨论的概念化:一个认知网络分析
本文探讨了小学教师如何理解英语语言艺术(ELA)和数学课堂讨论的目的和实践。研究表明,课堂讨论对学生的参与、批判性思维和概念理解有积极影响。此外,研究已经阐明了教师如何思考讨论和他们如何领导讨论之间的相互联系。本文运用认知网络分析,调查了小学教师在不同内容领域对课堂讨论概念化的差异。研究结果表明,教师对高质量讨论的概念在ELA和数学之间存在差异。了解这些变化可能对研究人员和专业发展提供者都有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Teacher Education
Teaching and Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
86 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信