Lijuan Wang , Kaiyao Jiang , Meiyu Qu , Zhiying Hao , Yan Song , Ruigang Hou
{"title":"Epidemiology and risk factors of invasive pulmonary fungal disease in patients with lung cancer","authors":"Lijuan Wang , Kaiyao Jiang , Meiyu Qu , Zhiying Hao , Yan Song , Ruigang Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2025.102901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with lung cancer exhibit heightened susceptibility to invasive pulmonary fungal diseases (IPFD) due to malignancy-associated immunosuppression. Current data on the pathogen distribution profile of IPFD in this population remain limited. This study investigated the epidemiological distribution of fungal pathogens causing IPFD in patients with lung cancer, with the aim of guiding clinical management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with lung cancer treated at the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from June 2019 to May 2024. Patients were included if they had a discharge diagnosis of IPFD, received antifungal therapy, or presented microbiological evidence of fungal infection. All patients were diagnosed according to the 2007 Revised Consensus on Pulmonary Fungal Infections. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent IPFD risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1274 with lung cancer, 92 had proven or probable IPFD. <em>Candida spp</em>. (57.4 %) and <em>Aspergillus spp.</em> (35.3 %) were the predominant pathogens, with sputum (77.94 %), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (17.65 %), and tissue (4.41 %) as specimen sources. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for IPFD with lung cancer: hypertension (OR=5.08; 95 %CI: 1.41–18.28, P = 0.013), chronic respiratory diseases (OR=3.13; 95 %CI: 1.14–8.56, P = 0.026), bone marrow suppression (OR=2.72; 95 % CI: 1.17–6.33, P = 0.020), multiple comorbidities (OR=2.68; 95 % CI: 1.02–7.09, P = 0.046), and smoking (OR=2.47; 95 %CI: 1.08–5.64, P = 0.032).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><em>Candida</em> and <em>Aspergillus</em> species were the most common causative agents of IPFD in patients with lung cancer. However, the emergence of less common fungi such as Geotrichum capitatum and Rhizopus microsporus, observed with increasing frequency in this study, warrants heightented clinical vigilance. Recognizing key risk factors, including chronic respiratory diseases, male sex, hypertension, multiple comorbidities and smoking, may guide early diagnosis and targeted antifungal therapy, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782125001614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patients with lung cancer exhibit heightened susceptibility to invasive pulmonary fungal diseases (IPFD) due to malignancy-associated immunosuppression. Current data on the pathogen distribution profile of IPFD in this population remain limited. This study investigated the epidemiological distribution of fungal pathogens causing IPFD in patients with lung cancer, with the aim of guiding clinical management.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with lung cancer treated at the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from June 2019 to May 2024. Patients were included if they had a discharge diagnosis of IPFD, received antifungal therapy, or presented microbiological evidence of fungal infection. All patients were diagnosed according to the 2007 Revised Consensus on Pulmonary Fungal Infections. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent IPFD risk factors.
Results
Of 1274 with lung cancer, 92 had proven or probable IPFD. Candida spp. (57.4 %) and Aspergillus spp. (35.3 %) were the predominant pathogens, with sputum (77.94 %), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (17.65 %), and tissue (4.41 %) as specimen sources. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for IPFD with lung cancer: hypertension (OR=5.08; 95 %CI: 1.41–18.28, P = 0.013), chronic respiratory diseases (OR=3.13; 95 %CI: 1.14–8.56, P = 0.026), bone marrow suppression (OR=2.72; 95 % CI: 1.17–6.33, P = 0.020), multiple comorbidities (OR=2.68; 95 % CI: 1.02–7.09, P = 0.046), and smoking (OR=2.47; 95 %CI: 1.08–5.64, P = 0.032).
Conclusions
Candida and Aspergillus species were the most common causative agents of IPFD in patients with lung cancer. However, the emergence of less common fungi such as Geotrichum capitatum and Rhizopus microsporus, observed with increasing frequency in this study, warrants heightented clinical vigilance. Recognizing key risk factors, including chronic respiratory diseases, male sex, hypertension, multiple comorbidities and smoking, may guide early diagnosis and targeted antifungal therapy, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including:
• Descriptive epidemiology
• Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis
• Screening and early detection
• Prevention and control
• Methodological issues
The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.