Indigenous placemaking amidst settler colonial leisure: A tale of Hawaiʻi's living parks

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Hiʻilei Julia Kawehipuaakahaopulani Hobart
{"title":"Indigenous placemaking amidst settler colonial leisure: A tale of Hawaiʻi's living parks","authors":"Hiʻilei Julia Kawehipuaakahaopulani Hobart","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>What does the production of public leisure space tell us about the 20th century mechanics of settler colonial dispossession? In the second half of the twentieth century, the nascent State of Hawaii expanded and developed its state parks system in an effort to enhance public leisure and natural resource conservation. In turn, several sites acquired for park facilities also catalyzed evictions and removals of the local and Indigenous people who lived there. This essay tracks the emergence of a compromise (attempted and in one case, successfully) to create a 'living park' in which residents would remain so that they might educate the public on traditional Native Hawaiian lifeways. This essay describes how midcentury park development did the work of Indigenous removal and erasure by neutralizing and democratizing park space: state-funded leisure space for <em>all</em> radically precluded Indigenous placemaking at a time when Kanaka Maoli communities felt the generational effects of American assimilation most acutely. Ultimately, this essay builds upon scholarly critiques leveraged against conservation politics in order to reveal the dispossessive logics bound up in the envisioning of settler colonial leisure space. Such an understanding offers fresh insight into the violences that occur when space is rendered ‘natural’ and ‘neutral’ and explores the decolonial possibilities embedded in Indigenous placemaking beyond leisure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103226"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001756","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What does the production of public leisure space tell us about the 20th century mechanics of settler colonial dispossession? In the second half of the twentieth century, the nascent State of Hawaii expanded and developed its state parks system in an effort to enhance public leisure and natural resource conservation. In turn, several sites acquired for park facilities also catalyzed evictions and removals of the local and Indigenous people who lived there. This essay tracks the emergence of a compromise (attempted and in one case, successfully) to create a 'living park' in which residents would remain so that they might educate the public on traditional Native Hawaiian lifeways. This essay describes how midcentury park development did the work of Indigenous removal and erasure by neutralizing and democratizing park space: state-funded leisure space for all radically precluded Indigenous placemaking at a time when Kanaka Maoli communities felt the generational effects of American assimilation most acutely. Ultimately, this essay builds upon scholarly critiques leveraged against conservation politics in order to reveal the dispossessive logics bound up in the envisioning of settler colonial leisure space. Such an understanding offers fresh insight into the violences that occur when space is rendered ‘natural’ and ‘neutral’ and explores the decolonial possibilities embedded in Indigenous placemaking beyond leisure.
在定居者殖民休闲中建立土著场所:夏威夷夏威夷生活公园的故事
公共休闲空间的生产告诉我们关于20世纪殖民者殖民剥夺的机制是什么?在20世纪下半叶,新生的夏威夷州扩大和发展了州立公园系统,以加强公共休闲和自然资源保护。反过来,为公园设施而获得的几个地点也催化了居住在那里的当地和土著居民的驱逐和搬迁。这篇文章追踪了一种妥协的出现(尝试过,在一个案例中成功了),即创建一个“生活公园”,居民将留在其中,以便他们可以教育公众传统的夏威夷原住民生活方式。这篇文章描述了世纪中叶的公园发展是如何通过中和和民主化公园空间来消除土著居民的:在卡纳卡毛利社区最强烈地感受到美国同化的世代影响的时候,国家资助的所有人的休闲空间从根本上排除了土著居民的场所创造。最后,这篇文章建立在对保护政治的学术批评的基础上,以揭示在殖民者殖民休闲空间的设想中捆绑在一起的剥夺逻辑。这样的理解为空间呈现“自然”和“中性”时发生的暴力提供了新的见解,并探索了土著空间创造中超越休闲的非殖民化可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信