Risk factors for delayed diagnosis of endometrial cancer among black individuals: Results from the GUIDE-EC study

IF 1.3 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Maya E. Gross , Mindy Pike , Julianna Alson , Patrice Williams , Mollie E. Wood , Erica Marsh , Erin Carey , Til Stürmer , Ronit Katz , Whitney R. Robinson , Kemi M. Doll
{"title":"Risk factors for delayed diagnosis of endometrial cancer among black individuals: Results from the GUIDE-EC study","authors":"Maya E. Gross ,&nbsp;Mindy Pike ,&nbsp;Julianna Alson ,&nbsp;Patrice Williams ,&nbsp;Mollie E. Wood ,&nbsp;Erica Marsh ,&nbsp;Erin Carey ,&nbsp;Til Stürmer ,&nbsp;Ronit Katz ,&nbsp;Whitney R. Robinson ,&nbsp;Kemi M. Doll","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Black patients with endometrial cancer (EC) experience disproportionately advanced stage at diagnosis. We aimed to identify variables, beyond race and histologic subtype, which increase risk for delayed diagnosis of EC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective study of Black individuals with EC in a large academic-affiliated healthcare system from 2014 to 2020. Primary outcome was delayed diagnosis of EC, defined as prolonged time to diagnosis (&gt;28 days to reach diagnosis). We used descriptive statistics, univariate regression, and factor analysis to identify variables associated with delayed diagnosis, achieve data reduction, and calculate odds ratios for delayed diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 388 patients with EC included for analysis, one fifth (n = 79, 20 %) experienced delayed diagnosis. Ultrasound had the strongest association with delayed diagnosis in univariate regression (OR 4.4, 95 % CI 2.4, 7.8) and factor analysis (OR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.6, 3.0). BMI ≥ 40 (OR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.1, 3.3) was also associated with delayed diagnosis. Age ≥ 50 was associated with decreased odds of delayed diagnosis (OR 0.3, 95 % CI 0.2, 0.7). Presence of an endometrial biopsy was associated with decreased odds of delayed diagnosis on univariate regression (OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2, 1.4).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A fifth of Black patients with EC experienced delayed diagnosis, and preoperative ultrasound was most strongly associated with delayed diagnosis. Providers should consider a tissue-sampling-first approach in Black patients at risk for EC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101922"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892500147X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Black patients with endometrial cancer (EC) experience disproportionately advanced stage at diagnosis. We aimed to identify variables, beyond race and histologic subtype, which increase risk for delayed diagnosis of EC.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of Black individuals with EC in a large academic-affiliated healthcare system from 2014 to 2020. Primary outcome was delayed diagnosis of EC, defined as prolonged time to diagnosis (>28 days to reach diagnosis). We used descriptive statistics, univariate regression, and factor analysis to identify variables associated with delayed diagnosis, achieve data reduction, and calculate odds ratios for delayed diagnosis.

Results

Of 388 patients with EC included for analysis, one fifth (n = 79, 20 %) experienced delayed diagnosis. Ultrasound had the strongest association with delayed diagnosis in univariate regression (OR 4.4, 95 % CI 2.4, 7.8) and factor analysis (OR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.6, 3.0). BMI ≥ 40 (OR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.1, 3.3) was also associated with delayed diagnosis. Age ≥ 50 was associated with decreased odds of delayed diagnosis (OR 0.3, 95 % CI 0.2, 0.7). Presence of an endometrial biopsy was associated with decreased odds of delayed diagnosis on univariate regression (OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2, 1.4).

Conclusions

A fifth of Black patients with EC experienced delayed diagnosis, and preoperative ultrasound was most strongly associated with delayed diagnosis. Providers should consider a tissue-sampling-first approach in Black patients at risk for EC.
黑人子宫内膜癌延迟诊断的危险因素:GUIDE-EC研究结果
目的:黑人子宫内膜癌(EC)患者在诊断时多处于晚期。我们的目的是确定除种族和组织学亚型外,会增加EC延迟诊断风险的变量。方法回顾性研究某大型学术附属医疗系统2014 - 2020年黑人EC患者。主要结局是延迟诊断EC,定义为诊断时间延长(28天达到诊断)。我们使用描述性统计、单变量回归和因子分析来识别与延迟诊断相关的变量,实现数据缩减,并计算延迟诊断的优势比。结果在纳入分析的388例EC患者中,五分之一(n = 79,20 %)出现延迟诊断。单因素回归分析(OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.4, 7.8)和因素分析(OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6, 3.0)显示,超声与延迟诊断的相关性最强。BMI≥40 (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1, 3.3)也与延迟诊断相关。年龄≥50岁与延迟诊断的几率降低相关(OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2, 0.7)。单因素回归显示,子宫内膜活检与延迟诊断的几率降低相关(OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 1.4)。结论五分之一的黑人EC患者延迟诊断,术前超声与延迟诊断相关性最强。提供者应考虑对有EC风险的黑人患者采用组织取样优先的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信