James Gbeku Alidzi , Owusu Amponsah , Joseph Kwawukume , Yetimoni Kpeebi , Stephen Appiah Takyi , Ibrahim Babine Suleman , Gideon Abagna Azunre
{"title":"Co-governance for green infrastructure preservation: Collaborative strategies in customary land tenure cities of Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"James Gbeku Alidzi , Owusu Amponsah , Joseph Kwawukume , Yetimoni Kpeebi , Stephen Appiah Takyi , Ibrahim Babine Suleman , Gideon Abagna Azunre","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) cities often struggle with the degradation of natural Green Infrastructure (GI), especially in cities where customary land tenure is more prevalent. Contrary to the prevailing narrative that traditional authorities are primarily responsible for this decline, this paper applies the collaborative governance theory to demonstrate the prospects of preserving GI in SSA cities through state-traditional institutional co-governance initiatives. Data for the paper was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Manhyia Palace and key paramouncies, and Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies in Kumasi in Ghana. Corresponding spatial data was gathered from satellite images on eight GI in Kumasi. Analysis of the spatial data revealed that prior to the co-governance arrangements, the selected GI were depleting at an annual rate of 4.7 % between 2003 and 2013, and 5.4 % between 2013 and 2019 mainly due to encroachment by grey land uses. Five years after the initiative (2019–2023), the annual rate of decline reduced to 0.9 %, with a total of 20.36 km<sup>2</sup> of GI preserved. Drawing from this analysis, we assert that co-governing GI by both state and traditional institutions, as emphasized by the collaborative governance theory, is a viable strategy for preserving GI in cities that are characterised by organic and informal development patterns, often spurred by customary land tenure arrangements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101315"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) cities often struggle with the degradation of natural Green Infrastructure (GI), especially in cities where customary land tenure is more prevalent. Contrary to the prevailing narrative that traditional authorities are primarily responsible for this decline, this paper applies the collaborative governance theory to demonstrate the prospects of preserving GI in SSA cities through state-traditional institutional co-governance initiatives. Data for the paper was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Manhyia Palace and key paramouncies, and Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies in Kumasi in Ghana. Corresponding spatial data was gathered from satellite images on eight GI in Kumasi. Analysis of the spatial data revealed that prior to the co-governance arrangements, the selected GI were depleting at an annual rate of 4.7 % between 2003 and 2013, and 5.4 % between 2013 and 2019 mainly due to encroachment by grey land uses. Five years after the initiative (2019–2023), the annual rate of decline reduced to 0.9 %, with a total of 20.36 km2 of GI preserved. Drawing from this analysis, we assert that co-governing GI by both state and traditional institutions, as emphasized by the collaborative governance theory, is a viable strategy for preserving GI in cities that are characterised by organic and informal development patterns, often spurred by customary land tenure arrangements.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.