Modification of black bean proteins using pulsed light and ultrasound treatment

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Gabriela Zanghelini , Laís Benvenutti , João B. Laurindo , Acácio A.F. Zielinski , Bruno A.M. Carciofi
{"title":"Modification of black bean proteins using pulsed light and ultrasound treatment","authors":"Gabriela Zanghelini ,&nbsp;Laís Benvenutti ,&nbsp;João B. Laurindo ,&nbsp;Acácio A.F. Zielinski ,&nbsp;Bruno A.M. Carciofi","doi":"10.1016/j.ifset.2025.104143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Black beans have been raising interest as a source of protein concentrates and isolates with high nutritional and functional properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulsed light (PL) on black bean protein (BBP) extracts for the first time and compare it with ultrasound (US) treatments, to expand the application potential of this protein. For this, an aqueous extract (TE = total extract) and an extract obtained by isoelectric precipitation (PE = precipitated extract) at a protein concentration of approximately 1 mg/mL were exposed to up to 30 pulses for PL treatment or ultrasonication at different levels (30% to 70%). The samples were characterized by techno-functional and structural properties. As expected, PE presented higher protein content (76 mg/100 g) than TE (48 mg/100 g). The differences in protein composition of PE and TE changed their techno-functional and structural characteristics. PL treatment improved emulsification capacity (EC) and foaming stability (FS), primarily in the more intense assay (30 pulses). In contrast, US treatment increased EC and foaming capacity (FC), primarily in the moderate intensity (50% amplitude). Furthermore, PL and US improved the surface hydrophobicity (H<sub>0</sub>) of PE while generally decreasing the free sulfhydryl groups (SH) of PE and TE. The observed changes were accompanied by alterations in the secondary structure of BBP extracts with increasing PL and US intensities. These results contribute to the current knowledge on non-thermal treatments, PL and US, and support their roles as promising tools to improve the application of black bean and other pulse proteins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":329,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 104143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856425002279","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black beans have been raising interest as a source of protein concentrates and isolates with high nutritional and functional properties. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulsed light (PL) on black bean protein (BBP) extracts for the first time and compare it with ultrasound (US) treatments, to expand the application potential of this protein. For this, an aqueous extract (TE = total extract) and an extract obtained by isoelectric precipitation (PE = precipitated extract) at a protein concentration of approximately 1 mg/mL were exposed to up to 30 pulses for PL treatment or ultrasonication at different levels (30% to 70%). The samples were characterized by techno-functional and structural properties. As expected, PE presented higher protein content (76 mg/100 g) than TE (48 mg/100 g). The differences in protein composition of PE and TE changed their techno-functional and structural characteristics. PL treatment improved emulsification capacity (EC) and foaming stability (FS), primarily in the more intense assay (30 pulses). In contrast, US treatment increased EC and foaming capacity (FC), primarily in the moderate intensity (50% amplitude). Furthermore, PL and US improved the surface hydrophobicity (H0) of PE while generally decreasing the free sulfhydryl groups (SH) of PE and TE. The observed changes were accompanied by alterations in the secondary structure of BBP extracts with increasing PL and US intensities. These results contribute to the current knowledge on non-thermal treatments, PL and US, and support their roles as promising tools to improve the application of black bean and other pulse proteins.
利用脉冲光和超声处理对黑豆蛋白进行修饰
作为一种具有高营养和功能特性的蛋白质浓缩物和分离物,黑豆已引起人们的兴趣。本研究旨在首次评价脉冲光(PL)处理对黑豆蛋白(BBP)提取物的影响,并与超声(US)处理进行比较,以拓展该蛋白的应用潜力。为此,将蛋白质浓度约为1 mg/mL的水萃取物(TE =总萃取物)和等电沉淀法获得的萃取物(PE =沉淀萃取物)暴露于最多30个脉冲下进行PL处理或不同水平(30%至70%)的超声波处理。对样品进行了技术功能和结构性能表征。正如预期的那样,PE的蛋白质含量(76 mg/100 g)高于TE (48 mg/100 g)。PE和TE蛋白组成的差异改变了它们的技术功能和结构特征。PL处理提高了乳化能力(EC)和发泡稳定性(FS),主要是在更强的实验(30脉冲)中。相比之下,US处理增加了EC和发泡能力(FC),主要是在中等强度(50%振幅)。此外,PL和US提高了PE的表面疏水性(H0),同时普遍降低了PE和TE的游离巯基(SH)。随着PL和US强度的增加,所观察到的变化伴随着BBP提取物二级结构的改变。这些结果有助于目前对非热处理、PL和US的认识,并支持它们作为有希望的工具来改善黑豆和其他脉冲蛋白的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
259
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies (IFSET) aims to provide the highest quality original contributions and few, mainly upon invitation, reviews on and highly innovative developments in food science and emerging food process technologies. The significance of the results either for the science community or for industrial R&D groups must be specified. Papers submitted must be of highest scientific quality and only those advancing current scientific knowledge and understanding or with technical relevance will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信