Do neuroscience knowledge and attitudes differ across pre-service and in-service teacher groups? Evidence from teacher education programs in China

IF 3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Lisha Liu , Saidi Yu , Mengyuan Liu , Chunjiang Li , Xiaodan Feng , Xintong Lin
{"title":"Do neuroscience knowledge and attitudes differ across pre-service and in-service teacher groups? Evidence from teacher education programs in China","authors":"Lisha Liu ,&nbsp;Saidi Yu ,&nbsp;Mengyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Chunjiang Li ,&nbsp;Xiaodan Feng ,&nbsp;Xintong Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2025.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teacher neuroscience knowledge has gained global attention. This study comparatively examined the neuroscience knowledge and attitudes of diverse pre-service and in-service teacher groups among 436 Chinese educators (180 pre-service and 256 in-service teachers) participating in diverse teacher education programs across China. Key findings indicate that: (1) Chinese teachers generally hold positive attitudes towards neuroscience and its educational applications, but had limited neuroscience knowledge, with in-service teachers showing more pronounced limitations. (2) In-service teachers critically lacked systematic opportunities to acquire neuroscience knowledge, primarily relying on informal media channels which posed risks. (3) Higher general brain knowledge positively predicted stronger neuromyth beliefs among pre-service teachers. Other influencing factors on knowledge and attitudes varied distinctly between the groups. These findings suggest the more structured neuroscience education in teacher training programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949325000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teacher neuroscience knowledge has gained global attention. This study comparatively examined the neuroscience knowledge and attitudes of diverse pre-service and in-service teacher groups among 436 Chinese educators (180 pre-service and 256 in-service teachers) participating in diverse teacher education programs across China. Key findings indicate that: (1) Chinese teachers generally hold positive attitudes towards neuroscience and its educational applications, but had limited neuroscience knowledge, with in-service teachers showing more pronounced limitations. (2) In-service teachers critically lacked systematic opportunities to acquire neuroscience knowledge, primarily relying on informal media channels which posed risks. (3) Higher general brain knowledge positively predicted stronger neuromyth beliefs among pre-service teachers. Other influencing factors on knowledge and attitudes varied distinctly between the groups. These findings suggest the more structured neuroscience education in teacher training programs.
在职前和在职教师群体中,神经科学知识和态度是否有所不同?来自中国教师教育项目的证据
教师的神经科学知识得到了全球的关注。本研究对436名中国教育工作者(180名职前教师和256名在职教师)参加全国不同教师教育项目的不同职前和在职教师群体的神经科学知识和态度进行了比较研究。主要研究结果表明:(1)中国教师对神经科学及其教育应用普遍持积极态度,但对神经科学知识的掌握程度有限,在职教师的局限性更为明显。(2)在职教师严重缺乏系统的神经科学知识获取机会,主要依赖非正式媒体渠道,存在风险。(3)职前教师较高的一般脑知识正向预测较强的神经神话信念。其他影响知识和态度的因素在两组之间差异很大。这些发现表明,在教师培训计划中,更有条理的神经科学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信