Central bank communication: A quantitative assessment

IF 1.2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ekkehard Ernst , Rossana Merola , Allan Gregory Ward Auclair
{"title":"Central bank communication: A quantitative assessment","authors":"Ekkehard Ernst ,&nbsp;Rossana Merola ,&nbsp;Allan Gregory Ward Auclair","doi":"10.1016/j.cbrev.2025.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we propose a new set of indicators of Central Bank's communication to estimate speech intensity in five different macroeconomic fields: monetary conditions, financial stability, external competitiveness, labour and social conditions and economic activity. In addition, we also built an index of Central Banks' communication about the state of the economy and related concepts like uncertainty and risk. To do this, we develop an automated text-mining routine using the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) collection of speeches given by Central Bank senior executives. We use this set of indicators to compare goals and strategies across several Central Banks (the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Reserve Bank of Australia) from the late 1990s up to 2023. We then assess whether communication intensity is mirrored in Central Banks' policy decisions. Our empirical results suggest that communication is usually a complement for monetary policy and that its intensity rises as monetary policy becomes more persistent. The late 2010s were an exception. With a near-binding ZLB, communications and policy actions diverged to some extent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43998,"journal":{"name":"Central Bank Review","volume":"25 3","pages":"Article 100212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Bank Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S130307012500023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new set of indicators of Central Bank's communication to estimate speech intensity in five different macroeconomic fields: monetary conditions, financial stability, external competitiveness, labour and social conditions and economic activity. In addition, we also built an index of Central Banks' communication about the state of the economy and related concepts like uncertainty and risk. To do this, we develop an automated text-mining routine using the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) collection of speeches given by Central Bank senior executives. We use this set of indicators to compare goals and strategies across several Central Banks (the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Reserve Bank of Australia) from the late 1990s up to 2023. We then assess whether communication intensity is mirrored in Central Banks' policy decisions. Our empirical results suggest that communication is usually a complement for monetary policy and that its intensity rises as monetary policy becomes more persistent. The late 2010s were an exception. With a near-binding ZLB, communications and policy actions diverged to some extent.
央行沟通:定量评估
在本文中,我们提出了一套新的中央银行沟通指标,以估计五个不同宏观经济领域的言论强度:货币状况、金融稳定、外部竞争力、劳动力和社会状况以及经济活动。此外,我们还建立了中央银行关于经济状况以及不确定性和风险等相关概念的沟通指数。为此,我们使用国际清算银行(BIS)中央银行高级管理人员的演讲集开发了一个自动文本挖掘例程。我们使用这组指标来比较几家中央银行(美联储、欧洲中央银行、英格兰银行和澳大利亚储备银行)从20世纪90年代末到2023年的目标和策略。然后,我们评估沟通强度是否反映在央行的政策决定中。我们的实证结果表明,沟通通常是货币政策的补充,其强度随着货币政策变得更加持久而上升。2010年代末是个例外。在接近约束性的ZLB下,沟通和政策行动在一定程度上出现了分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central Bank Review
Central Bank Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信