Min Seok Kim, Kwangsic Joo, Yong-Un Shin, Hee Yoon Cho, Joo Yong Lee, Min Sagong, Jee Taek Kim, Yu Cheol Kim, Hyun Woong Kim, Hyunduck Kwak, Seong Joon Ahn, Mee Yon Lee, Jeong Hun Bae, Inyoung Chung, Yong Seop Han, Woong-Sun Yoo, Sungwho Park, Do Gyun Kim, Hae Min Kang, Hee Seung Chin, Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang, Yong-Sok Ji, Kyu Hyung Park
{"title":"Treatment Trends of Diabetic Macular Edema in Korea (TRACK) study: A Prospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Min Seok Kim, Kwangsic Joo, Yong-Un Shin, Hee Yoon Cho, Joo Yong Lee, Min Sagong, Jee Taek Kim, Yu Cheol Kim, Hyun Woong Kim, Hyunduck Kwak, Seong Joon Ahn, Mee Yon Lee, Jeong Hun Bae, Inyoung Chung, Yong Seop Han, Woong-Sun Yoo, Sungwho Park, Do Gyun Kim, Hae Min Kang, Hee Seung Chin, Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang, Yong-Sok Ji, Kyu Hyung Park","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2025.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate real-world functional and anatomical outcomes, treatment patterns, and ocular examination trends in diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 17 hospitals (2017-2022) involving adults with DME. Patients were categorized into center-involving (CI DME) and non-center-involving (non-CI DME) groups based on optical coherence tomography findings. Serial changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and treatment and examination patterns were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits (6, 12, 18, and 24 months), and analyzed using linear mixed models and paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 participants (38.8% women; mean age, 60.2±10.8 years) were enrolled. Over 24 months, 10/68 (14.7%) non-CI DME patients developed CI DME. CST significantly decreased in the CI DME group (from 419µm at baseline to 343µm, P=0.001), whereas BCVA remained unchanged in both groups. Throughout the two-year period, the average number of anti-VEGF injections was 3.1±3.6, while steroid injections averaged 0.7±1.5. The CI DME group received significantly more anti-VEGF injections compared to the non-CI DME group (3.8±3.9 vs. 2.0±2.8, P=0.004). Additionally, the CI DME group had more frequent visits (15.8 vs. 11.3, P=0.017) and OCT examinations (9.7 vs. 7.4, P=0.023). The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased in the CI DME group over time, while the number of visits decreased in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world clinical practice in Korea, the treatment and monitoring frequency for DME was lower than in major clinical trials, potentially contributing to suboptimal visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101356,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2025.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate real-world functional and anatomical outcomes, treatment patterns, and ocular examination trends in diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea.
Methods: A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 17 hospitals (2017-2022) involving adults with DME. Patients were categorized into center-involving (CI DME) and non-center-involving (non-CI DME) groups based on optical coherence tomography findings. Serial changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and treatment and examination patterns were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits (6, 12, 18, and 24 months), and analyzed using linear mixed models and paired t-tests.
Results: A total of 209 participants (38.8% women; mean age, 60.2±10.8 years) were enrolled. Over 24 months, 10/68 (14.7%) non-CI DME patients developed CI DME. CST significantly decreased in the CI DME group (from 419µm at baseline to 343µm, P=0.001), whereas BCVA remained unchanged in both groups. Throughout the two-year period, the average number of anti-VEGF injections was 3.1±3.6, while steroid injections averaged 0.7±1.5. The CI DME group received significantly more anti-VEGF injections compared to the non-CI DME group (3.8±3.9 vs. 2.0±2.8, P=0.004). Additionally, the CI DME group had more frequent visits (15.8 vs. 11.3, P=0.017) and OCT examinations (9.7 vs. 7.4, P=0.023). The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased in the CI DME group over time, while the number of visits decreased in both groups.
Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice in Korea, the treatment and monitoring frequency for DME was lower than in major clinical trials, potentially contributing to suboptimal visual outcomes.