Treatment Trends of Diabetic Macular Edema in Korea (TRACK) study: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Min Seok Kim, Kwangsic Joo, Yong-Un Shin, Hee Yoon Cho, Joo Yong Lee, Min Sagong, Jee Taek Kim, Yu Cheol Kim, Hyun Woong Kim, Hyunduck Kwak, Seong Joon Ahn, Mee Yon Lee, Jeong Hun Bae, Inyoung Chung, Yong Seop Han, Woong-Sun Yoo, Sungwho Park, Do Gyun Kim, Hae Min Kang, Hee Seung Chin, Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang, Yong-Sok Ji, Kyu Hyung Park
{"title":"Treatment Trends of Diabetic Macular Edema in Korea (TRACK) study: A Prospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Min Seok Kim, Kwangsic Joo, Yong-Un Shin, Hee Yoon Cho, Joo Yong Lee, Min Sagong, Jee Taek Kim, Yu Cheol Kim, Hyun Woong Kim, Hyunduck Kwak, Seong Joon Ahn, Mee Yon Lee, Jeong Hun Bae, Inyoung Chung, Yong Seop Han, Woong-Sun Yoo, Sungwho Park, Do Gyun Kim, Hae Min Kang, Hee Seung Chin, Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang, Yong-Sok Ji, Kyu Hyung Park","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2025.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate real-world functional and anatomical outcomes, treatment patterns, and ocular examination trends in diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 17 hospitals (2017-2022) involving adults with DME. Patients were categorized into center-involving (CI DME) and non-center-involving (non-CI DME) groups based on optical coherence tomography findings. Serial changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and treatment and examination patterns were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits (6, 12, 18, and 24 months), and analyzed using linear mixed models and paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 participants (38.8% women; mean age, 60.2±10.8 years) were enrolled. Over 24 months, 10/68 (14.7%) non-CI DME patients developed CI DME. CST significantly decreased in the CI DME group (from 419µm at baseline to 343µm, P=0.001), whereas BCVA remained unchanged in both groups. Throughout the two-year period, the average number of anti-VEGF injections was 3.1±3.6, while steroid injections averaged 0.7±1.5. The CI DME group received significantly more anti-VEGF injections compared to the non-CI DME group (3.8±3.9 vs. 2.0±2.8, P=0.004). Additionally, the CI DME group had more frequent visits (15.8 vs. 11.3, P=0.017) and OCT examinations (9.7 vs. 7.4, P=0.023). The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased in the CI DME group over time, while the number of visits decreased in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world clinical practice in Korea, the treatment and monitoring frequency for DME was lower than in major clinical trials, potentially contributing to suboptimal visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101356,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2025.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate real-world functional and anatomical outcomes, treatment patterns, and ocular examination trends in diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea.

Methods: A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 17 hospitals (2017-2022) involving adults with DME. Patients were categorized into center-involving (CI DME) and non-center-involving (non-CI DME) groups based on optical coherence tomography findings. Serial changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and treatment and examination patterns were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits (6, 12, 18, and 24 months), and analyzed using linear mixed models and paired t-tests.

Results: A total of 209 participants (38.8% women; mean age, 60.2±10.8 years) were enrolled. Over 24 months, 10/68 (14.7%) non-CI DME patients developed CI DME. CST significantly decreased in the CI DME group (from 419µm at baseline to 343µm, P=0.001), whereas BCVA remained unchanged in both groups. Throughout the two-year period, the average number of anti-VEGF injections was 3.1±3.6, while steroid injections averaged 0.7±1.5. The CI DME group received significantly more anti-VEGF injections compared to the non-CI DME group (3.8±3.9 vs. 2.0±2.8, P=0.004). Additionally, the CI DME group had more frequent visits (15.8 vs. 11.3, P=0.017) and OCT examinations (9.7 vs. 7.4, P=0.023). The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased in the CI DME group over time, while the number of visits decreased in both groups.

Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice in Korea, the treatment and monitoring frequency for DME was lower than in major clinical trials, potentially contributing to suboptimal visual outcomes.

韩国糖尿病性黄斑水肿的治疗趋势(TRACK)研究:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
目的:评估韩国糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的实际功能和解剖结果、治疗模式和眼科检查趋势。方法:在17家医院(2017-2022年)开展了一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,涉及成年DME患者。根据光学相干断层扫描结果将患者分为中心累及组(CI DME)和非中心累及组(non-CI DME)。在基线和随访(6、12、18和24个月)记录最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中央中央凹下厚度(CST)以及治疗和检查模式的系列变化,并使用线性混合模型和配对t检验进行分析。结果:共有209名参与者(38.8%为女性;平均年龄(60.2±10.8岁)。超过24个月,10/68(14.7%)非CI DME患者发展为CI DME。CST在CI DME组显著降低(从基线时的419µm降至343µm, P=0.001),而BCVA在两组均保持不变。2年期间,平均抗vegf注射次数为3.1±3.6次,类固醇注射次数为0.7±1.5次。CI DME组比非CI DME组接受更多的抗vegf注射(3.8±3.9比2.0±2.8,P=0.004)。此外,CI DME组就诊频率更高(15.8比11.3,P=0.017), OCT检查频率更高(9.7比7.4,P=0.023)。随着时间的推移,CI - DME组的抗vegf注射次数减少,而两组的就诊次数均减少。结论:在韩国的实际临床实践中,DME的治疗和监测频率低于主要临床试验,可能导致视力不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信