Social influence increases the value and consumption of alcohol in the laboratory

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Jack Yates, Benjamin Miller, Alazne Arraztio Cordoba, Jasmine Grace Warren, Michael Batterley, Jessica Catherine Gay, Abigail K. Rose, Carl A. Roberts, Andrew Jones
{"title":"Social influence increases the value and consumption of alcohol in the laboratory","authors":"Jack Yates,&nbsp;Benjamin Miller,&nbsp;Alazne Arraztio Cordoba,&nbsp;Jasmine Grace Warren,&nbsp;Michael Batterley,&nbsp;Jessica Catherine Gay,&nbsp;Abigail K. Rose,&nbsp;Carl A. Roberts,&nbsp;Andrew Jones","doi":"10.1111/acer.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Previous research has demonstrated the perceived value of alcohol is transient in hypothetical social and environmental contexts. This study sought to further expand on this by examining whether the social influence of a confederate and the physical environment could be manipulated to influence the value of alcohol and ad libitum alcohol consumption, and thus provide support for the role of value as a mechanism underlying alcohol use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 140 (90 female, Mean age = 25.81, SD = 14.20, Mean AUDIT = 11.51, SD = 5.38) participants completed a between-subjects 2 (environment: bar labortaory vs. standard unadorned) × 2 (social influence: positive appraisal vs. negative appraisal) design in which they completed a brief assessment of alcohol demand, a concurrent choice task, and a visual analogue scale measuring alcohol value, following a limited drinking session with a confederate in one of two laboratory settings, and then completed an ad libitum bogus taste test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Social influence had a significant effect on intensity index of demand (<i>F</i> (1,133) = 4.74, <i>p</i> = 0.031, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.03) and on ad libitum consumption (<i>F</i> (1,135) = 7.60, <i>p</i> = 0.007, <i>ηp</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.05) with positive appraisal having greater intensity scores (Mean = 4.34, SD = 2.80) compared with the negative appraisal (Mean = 3.39, SD = 2.23) and more alcohol consumed (Mean = 221.07 mL, SD = 121.76 vs. Mean = 164.71 mL, SD = 111.80). The intensity index also mediated the relationship between social influence and ad libitum consumption (B = 10.40, 95% Bootstrapped CIs = 0.34 to 23.59). There were no significant main effects of environment and no interactions between social influence and environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest alcohol value is sensitive to social influence. Increased value as a result of positive alcohol appraisals by others had a significant effect on ad libitum consumption and that the intensity index of demand mediated the relationship.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 9","pages":"2038-2048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70115","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous research has demonstrated the perceived value of alcohol is transient in hypothetical social and environmental contexts. This study sought to further expand on this by examining whether the social influence of a confederate and the physical environment could be manipulated to influence the value of alcohol and ad libitum alcohol consumption, and thus provide support for the role of value as a mechanism underlying alcohol use.

Method

A total of 140 (90 female, Mean age = 25.81, SD = 14.20, Mean AUDIT = 11.51, SD = 5.38) participants completed a between-subjects 2 (environment: bar labortaory vs. standard unadorned) × 2 (social influence: positive appraisal vs. negative appraisal) design in which they completed a brief assessment of alcohol demand, a concurrent choice task, and a visual analogue scale measuring alcohol value, following a limited drinking session with a confederate in one of two laboratory settings, and then completed an ad libitum bogus taste test.

Results

Social influence had a significant effect on intensity index of demand (F (1,133) = 4.74, p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.03) and on ad libitum consumption (F (1,135) = 7.60, p = 0.007, ηp2 = 0.05) with positive appraisal having greater intensity scores (Mean = 4.34, SD = 2.80) compared with the negative appraisal (Mean = 3.39, SD = 2.23) and more alcohol consumed (Mean = 221.07 mL, SD = 121.76 vs. Mean = 164.71 mL, SD = 111.80). The intensity index also mediated the relationship between social influence and ad libitum consumption (B = 10.40, 95% Bootstrapped CIs = 0.34 to 23.59). There were no significant main effects of environment and no interactions between social influence and environment.

Conclusion

These findings suggest alcohol value is sensitive to social influence. Increased value as a result of positive alcohol appraisals by others had a significant effect on ad libitum consumption and that the intensity index of demand mediated the relationship.

Abstract Image

社会影响增加了实验室酒精的价值和消耗量。
背景:先前的研究表明,在假设的社会和环境背景下,酒精的感知价值是短暂的。本研究试图进一步扩展这一点,通过检查是否可以操纵同伙的社会影响和物理环境来影响酒精的价值和随意饮酒,从而为价值作为酒精使用的机制的作用提供支持。方法:140名参与者(女性90名,平均年龄25.81岁,SD = 14.20,平均审计= 11.51,SD = 5.38)完成受试者间2(环境:酒吧实验室vs.标准无装饰)× 2(社会影响:积极评价与消极评价)设计中,他们完成了酒精需求的简短评估,并发选择任务,以及测量酒精值的视觉模拟量表,在两个实验室环境中的一个与同伙一起有限饮酒后,然后完成了一个随意的虚假味觉测试。结果:社会影响对需求强度指数(F (1,133) = 4.74, p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.03)和随意饮酒量(F (1,135) = 7.60, p = 0.007, ηp2 = 0.05)有显著影响,积极评价比消极评价(Mean = 3.39, SD = 2.23)具有更高的强度得分(Mean = 4.34, SD = 2.80)和更多的酒精消耗(Mean = 221.07 mL, SD = 121.76比Mean = 164.71 mL, SD = 111.80)。强度指数也在社会影响与随意消费之间起中介作用(B = 10.40, 95% bootstrap ci = 0.34 ~ 23.59)。环境的主要影响不显著,社会影响与环境之间不存在交互作用。结论:酒精值对社会影响较为敏感。由于他人对酒精的积极评价而增加的价值对随意消费有显著影响,并且需求强度指数介导了这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信