A pilot study on the pattern of COVID-19 information sources and its associated factors among the public in Qatar: a cross-sectional survey.

Q3 Medicine
Qatar Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5339/qmj.2025.47
Wafa Mohammed Ahmed, Ayman Aldahshan, Mohamed Abdien, Iheb Buogmiza
{"title":"A pilot study on the pattern of COVID-19 information sources and its associated factors among the public in Qatar: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Wafa Mohammed Ahmed, Ayman Aldahshan, Mohamed Abdien, Iheb Buogmiza","doi":"10.5339/qmj.2025.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus pandemic, many people looked for information on COVID-19 through social, official, and traditional media sources. This caustic situation resulted in panic among the public, leading to many false news, conspiracy theories, and magical cures being spread among the public at an alarming rate. Controversial theories about the validity of vaccination and non-adoption of disease control resulted in a slow disease control rate and adverse impacts on global health and the economy. Recent studies have shown that health information could safely guard mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. To adopt a disease control strategy, it is essential to identify the public confidence in information sources and the most efficient media to disseminate intervention messages to the public. The main objectives of this study were to identify from 12 alternative information sources the most utilized COVID-19 source of information, the most trusted information source, and the factors associated with high trust in a given source.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey with 442 participants aged 18 years and above was conducted to assess public views and preferences on sources of information for COVID-19. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and logistic regression analyses. Bloom's scale, composite score preference, and chi-squared test were determined for result evaluation purposes.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>The study findings suggest that the Ministry of Public Health is a widely trusted information source that offers a potentially effective tool for shaping, designing, and disseminating information messages to shape public attitudes toward control of COVID-19 and enhancement of preventive actions. By offering insight into the pattern of COVID-19 information sources and its associated factors among the public in Qatar, the study formulated a set of recommendations for health decision-makers to set packages to help manage and control the spread of coronavirus.</p>","PeriodicalId":53667,"journal":{"name":"Qatar Medical Journal","volume":"2025 2","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qatar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2025.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus pandemic, many people looked for information on COVID-19 through social, official, and traditional media sources. This caustic situation resulted in panic among the public, leading to many false news, conspiracy theories, and magical cures being spread among the public at an alarming rate. Controversial theories about the validity of vaccination and non-adoption of disease control resulted in a slow disease control rate and adverse impacts on global health and the economy. Recent studies have shown that health information could safely guard mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. To adopt a disease control strategy, it is essential to identify the public confidence in information sources and the most efficient media to disseminate intervention messages to the public. The main objectives of this study were to identify from 12 alternative information sources the most utilized COVID-19 source of information, the most trusted information source, and the factors associated with high trust in a given source.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey with 442 participants aged 18 years and above was conducted to assess public views and preferences on sources of information for COVID-19. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and logistic regression analyses. Bloom's scale, composite score preference, and chi-squared test were determined for result evaluation purposes.

Results and conclusion: The study findings suggest that the Ministry of Public Health is a widely trusted information source that offers a potentially effective tool for shaping, designing, and disseminating information messages to shape public attitudes toward control of COVID-19 and enhancement of preventive actions. By offering insight into the pattern of COVID-19 information sources and its associated factors among the public in Qatar, the study formulated a set of recommendations for health decision-makers to set packages to help manage and control the spread of coronavirus.

卡塔尔公众中COVID-19信息来源模式及其相关因素的试点研究:横断面调查
背景:在冠状病毒大流行期间,许多人通过社交、官方和传统媒体渠道寻找有关COVID-19的信息。这种刻薄的情况引起了公众的恐慌,导致许多假新闻、阴谋论和神奇的治疗方法以惊人的速度在公众中传播。关于疫苗接种有效性的有争议的理论和不采用疾病控制导致疾病控制率缓慢,并对全球健康和经济产生不利影响。最近的研究表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,健康信息可以安全地保护心理健康。为了采取一项疾病控制战略,必须确定公众对信息来源和向公众传播干预信息的最有效媒体的信心。本研究的主要目标是从12个替代信息来源中确定使用率最高的COVID-19信息来源、最受信任的信息来源以及与给定来源的高度信任相关的因素。方法:对442名18岁及以上的参与者进行横断面在线调查,评估公众对COVID-19信息来源的看法和偏好。数据分析采用描述性统计、相关性和逻辑回归分析。采用Bloom量表、综合评分偏好、卡方检验进行结果评价。结果和结论:研究结果表明,公共卫生部是一个广泛信任的信息来源,为塑造、设计和传播信息信息提供了潜在的有效工具,以塑造公众对控制COVID-19和加强预防行动的态度。通过深入了解卡塔尔公众中COVID-19信息来源的模式及其相关因素,该研究为卫生决策者制定一揽子方案以帮助管理和控制冠状病毒的传播制定了一套建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qatar Medical Journal
Qatar Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信