Ria Wardani, Heliany Kiswantomo, Tessalonika Sembiring, Gilles van Luijtelaar
{"title":"Are executive functions among Javanese and Sundanese affected by language spoken at home and in public?","authors":"Ria Wardani, Heliany Kiswantomo, Tessalonika Sembiring, Gilles van Luijtelaar","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2545545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The need for standardized neuropsychological tests, scoring, and interpretation is crucial for distinguishing individuals with normal cognitive function from those with deficits. Executive function (EF) is one of four cognitive domains assessed by the Indonesian Neuropsychological Test Battery (INTB), which is administered exclusively in Bahasa Indonesia. Given Indonesia's ethnic and linguistic diversity, ensuring equal validity of EF tests across groups is essential. This study examined potential ethnic differences between the Javanese and Sundanese, Indonesia's two largest ethnic groups, and the influence of languages spoken at home and in public on performance in five EF tests: digit span, five-point, trail making, verbal fluency, and Stroop. A total of 147 healthy participants, matched for age and education, were assessed. Results revealed minimal performance differences between ethnicities. However, language spoken at home significantly affected scores across all tests for both groups. Participants who did not speak Bahasa Indonesia at home showed disadvantages, while bilinguals demonstrated advantages on the Stroop test. The findings show that home language influences EF test outcomes and that bilingualism confers benefits. Hence, language spoken at home constitutes a key demographic factor affecting EF performance alongside age and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2545545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The need for standardized neuropsychological tests, scoring, and interpretation is crucial for distinguishing individuals with normal cognitive function from those with deficits. Executive function (EF) is one of four cognitive domains assessed by the Indonesian Neuropsychological Test Battery (INTB), which is administered exclusively in Bahasa Indonesia. Given Indonesia's ethnic and linguistic diversity, ensuring equal validity of EF tests across groups is essential. This study examined potential ethnic differences between the Javanese and Sundanese, Indonesia's two largest ethnic groups, and the influence of languages spoken at home and in public on performance in five EF tests: digit span, five-point, trail making, verbal fluency, and Stroop. A total of 147 healthy participants, matched for age and education, were assessed. Results revealed minimal performance differences between ethnicities. However, language spoken at home significantly affected scores across all tests for both groups. Participants who did not speak Bahasa Indonesia at home showed disadvantages, while bilinguals demonstrated advantages on the Stroop test. The findings show that home language influences EF test outcomes and that bilingualism confers benefits. Hence, language spoken at home constitutes a key demographic factor affecting EF performance alongside age and education.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.