Aging in the community: Factors associated with home adaptations and receipt of informal care, home care, and community support services among older Canadians.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Heather Gilmour, Michelle Rotermann
{"title":"Aging in the community: Factors associated with home adaptations and receipt of informal care, home care, and community support services among older Canadians.","authors":"Heather Gilmour, Michelle Rotermann","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202500700002-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most older Canadians would prefer to stay in their own homes and communities rather than move to long-term care (LTC) facilities. A growing older population, limited LTC capacity, and costs have increased demand for initiatives that enable people to age in their communities for as long as possible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2019/2020 Canadian Health Survey on Seniors were used to estimate the prevalence of four types of supports and services (SSs) that assist with living in the community: home adaptations, informal care, home care, and community support services. Separate multivariable logistic regressions for each SS, stratified by age group (65 to 79 years and 80 years or older), examined associations with need-related factors, enabling resources, and predisposing characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 25.0% of 65- to 79-year-olds and 51.9% of those aged 80 years or older, home adaptations were the most prevalent SS used in Canada. Use of home care, community support services and informal care was less common, ranging from 5.5% to 11.6% among Canadians aged 65 to 79 and 17.2% to 33.2% among those aged 80 or older. Nonetheless, substantial proportions of the younger (65.4%) and older (31.8%) age groups reported no SS use. In general, having a poor health status, having impairment, not driving, being older, living alone, having a regular health care provider, and being a woman increased the odds of using SSs.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Understanding the factors associated with SS use can help inform policies and programs aimed at assisting older Canadians with aging in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"36 7","pages":"15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202500700002-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most older Canadians would prefer to stay in their own homes and communities rather than move to long-term care (LTC) facilities. A growing older population, limited LTC capacity, and costs have increased demand for initiatives that enable people to age in their communities for as long as possible.

Methods: Data from the 2019/2020 Canadian Health Survey on Seniors were used to estimate the prevalence of four types of supports and services (SSs) that assist with living in the community: home adaptations, informal care, home care, and community support services. Separate multivariable logistic regressions for each SS, stratified by age group (65 to 79 years and 80 years or older), examined associations with need-related factors, enabling resources, and predisposing characteristics.

Results: At 25.0% of 65- to 79-year-olds and 51.9% of those aged 80 years or older, home adaptations were the most prevalent SS used in Canada. Use of home care, community support services and informal care was less common, ranging from 5.5% to 11.6% among Canadians aged 65 to 79 and 17.2% to 33.2% among those aged 80 or older. Nonetheless, substantial proportions of the younger (65.4%) and older (31.8%) age groups reported no SS use. In general, having a poor health status, having impairment, not driving, being older, living alone, having a regular health care provider, and being a woman increased the odds of using SSs.

Interpretation: Understanding the factors associated with SS use can help inform policies and programs aimed at assisting older Canadians with aging in the community.

社区中的老龄化:与加拿大老年人家庭适应和接受非正式护理、家庭护理和社区支持服务相关的因素。
背景:大多数加拿大老年人更愿意呆在自己的家里和社区,而不是搬到长期护理机构。不断增长的老年人口、有限的LTC能力和成本增加了对使人们能够在社区中尽可能长时间地老化的举措的需求。方法:使用2019/2020年加拿大老年人健康调查的数据来估计四种帮助社区生活的支持和服务(SSs)的流行程度:家庭适应、非正式护理、家庭护理和社区支持服务。对每个SS进行单独的多变量logistic回归,按年龄组(65至79岁和80岁或以上)分层,检查与需求相关因素、使能资源和易感特征的关联。结果:在加拿大,25.0%的65- 79岁人群和51.9%的80岁或以上人群中,家庭适应是最普遍的SS。使用家庭护理、社区支持服务和非正式护理的情况较少,在65岁至79岁的加拿大人中占5.5%至11.6%,在80岁或以上的加拿大人中占17.2%至33.2%。尽管如此,相当大比例的年轻人(65.4%)和老年人(31.8%)没有使用SS。一般来说,健康状况不佳、有损伤、不开车、年龄较大、独居、有固定的医疗保健提供者以及女性增加了使用社会保险的几率。解释:了解与SS使用相关的因素可以帮助制定旨在帮助社区中老年加拿大人的政策和计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信