{"title":"Genetically proxied gut microbiota and cancer risk: a scoping review of Mendelian randomization studies.","authors":"Yating Cui, Jianguo Xu, Qingyong Zheng, Junfei Wang, Caihua Xu, Mingyue Zhang, Jiang Li, Jinhui Tian","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01685-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is a critical global health issue, and gut microbiota is considered a potential factor in the development of cancers. This review synthesizes evidence from Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies to explore the potential causal links between gut microbiota and cancer risk, thereby addressing the limitations inherent in observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adopted a systematic literature review approach to search the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to December 2023 for all MR studies examining the relationship between gut microbial diversity, strain-specific abundance, and cancer risk. Data extraction encompassed study design, study population, definition of microbial exposure, details of genetic instrument variables, sample size, effect estimates, and statistical significance. Given the diversity of genetic tools across different studies, the results of each study were presented in the form of a forest plot, and quality was assessed according to STROBE-MR criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 12 MR studies involving the relationships between 91 gut microbiota species and 14 types of cancer. The studies found that 64 of these gut microbiota species have potential protective effects against cancers, while 52 show tendencies to promote cancer development. Additionally, the relationship between 17 gut microbiota species and cancer remains unclear. Notably, the same gut microbiota species may have distinctly different impacts on different types of cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diverse gut microbiota have varied impacts on different cancer types. This microbial influence on cancer is not static; it changes dynamically. These changes are linked to variations in inflammation, metabolite adjustments, and differences in gut barrier function.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01685-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer is a critical global health issue, and gut microbiota is considered a potential factor in the development of cancers. This review synthesizes evidence from Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies to explore the potential causal links between gut microbiota and cancer risk, thereby addressing the limitations inherent in observational studies.
Methods: We adopted a systematic literature review approach to search the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to December 2023 for all MR studies examining the relationship between gut microbial diversity, strain-specific abundance, and cancer risk. Data extraction encompassed study design, study population, definition of microbial exposure, details of genetic instrument variables, sample size, effect estimates, and statistical significance. Given the diversity of genetic tools across different studies, the results of each study were presented in the form of a forest plot, and quality was assessed according to STROBE-MR criteria.
Results: We reviewed 12 MR studies involving the relationships between 91 gut microbiota species and 14 types of cancer. The studies found that 64 of these gut microbiota species have potential protective effects against cancers, while 52 show tendencies to promote cancer development. Additionally, the relationship between 17 gut microbiota species and cancer remains unclear. Notably, the same gut microbiota species may have distinctly different impacts on different types of cancer.
Conclusion: Diverse gut microbiota have varied impacts on different cancer types. This microbial influence on cancer is not static; it changes dynamically. These changes are linked to variations in inflammation, metabolite adjustments, and differences in gut barrier function.
背景:癌症是一个重要的全球健康问题,肠道微生物群被认为是癌症发展的潜在因素。本综述综合了孟德尔随机化(MR)研究的证据,以探索肠道微生物群与癌症风险之间的潜在因果关系,从而解决观察性研究固有的局限性。方法:我们采用系统的文献综述方法,检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库,检索截至2023年12月的所有MR研究,研究肠道微生物多样性、菌株特异性丰度和癌症风险之间的关系。数据提取包括研究设计、研究人群、微生物暴露的定义、遗传仪器变量的细节、样本量、效果估计和统计显著性。考虑到不同研究中遗传工具的多样性,每项研究的结果都以森林样地的形式呈现,并根据STROBE-MR标准评估质量。结果:我们回顾了涉及91种肠道微生物群与14种癌症之间关系的12项MR研究。研究发现,这些肠道菌群中有64种对癌症有潜在的保护作用,而52种有促进癌症发展的倾向。此外,17种肠道菌群与癌症之间的关系尚不清楚。值得注意的是,相同的肠道菌群可能对不同类型的癌症有明显不同的影响。结论:不同的肠道菌群对不同类型的癌症有不同的影响。微生物对癌症的影响不是一成不变的;它是动态变化的。这些变化与炎症、代谢物调节和肠道屏障功能的差异有关。
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.