Leading Practices to Safeguard the Mental Health of Investigators and Trainees in Research Teams.

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Melissa Corrente, Jelena Atanackovic, Sarah Simkin, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault
{"title":"Leading Practices to Safeguard the Mental Health of Investigators and Trainees in Research Teams.","authors":"Melissa Corrente, Jelena Atanackovic, Sarah Simkin, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault","doi":"10.1177/10482911251362477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the stresses associated with academia and graduate studies are well recognized, there remains a gap in our understanding of how best to support the mental health of investigators and trainees in research teams. As part of the Healthy Professional Worker Partnership, we collected insights from trainees, co-investigators, the project director and the co-leads of a trainee support network. Their research involved conducting interviews that sometimes addressed sensitive or traumatic subjects. Using a public health theoretical framework with inductive thematic analysis of exit interviews and written feedback, we developed guidance for safeguarding the mental health of researchers. Key responsive interventions to address mental health challenges included regular training and check-ins, reducing the frequency of the interviews conducted by trainees and applying strategies to handle the mental health impacts of their content, and proactive workload management. Promising practices emerged, such as establishing a trainee support network and a compendium of resources, integrating debrief time, ensuring clear communication, and adapting expectations and timelines. Recommendations emphasize the importance of responsiveness, collaboration and flexibility, alongside a formalized onboarding process. Research teams, especially those that are large, geographically distributed, or undertaking research on challenging issues, need a systematic approach to promotion of mental health, prevention of mental ill-health, and remediation of mental illness. This study offers practical guidance for fostering healthier and more supportive research environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"304-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911251362477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the stresses associated with academia and graduate studies are well recognized, there remains a gap in our understanding of how best to support the mental health of investigators and trainees in research teams. As part of the Healthy Professional Worker Partnership, we collected insights from trainees, co-investigators, the project director and the co-leads of a trainee support network. Their research involved conducting interviews that sometimes addressed sensitive or traumatic subjects. Using a public health theoretical framework with inductive thematic analysis of exit interviews and written feedback, we developed guidance for safeguarding the mental health of researchers. Key responsive interventions to address mental health challenges included regular training and check-ins, reducing the frequency of the interviews conducted by trainees and applying strategies to handle the mental health impacts of their content, and proactive workload management. Promising practices emerged, such as establishing a trainee support network and a compendium of resources, integrating debrief time, ensuring clear communication, and adapting expectations and timelines. Recommendations emphasize the importance of responsiveness, collaboration and flexibility, alongside a formalized onboarding process. Research teams, especially those that are large, geographically distributed, or undertaking research on challenging issues, need a systematic approach to promotion of mental health, prevention of mental ill-health, and remediation of mental illness. This study offers practical guidance for fostering healthier and more supportive research environments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

保障科研团队调查人员和学员心理健康的领先实践。
虽然与学术和研究生学习相关的压力是公认的,但我们对如何最好地支持研究团队中调查人员和受训者的心理健康的理解仍然存在差距。作为健康专业工作者伙伴关系的一部分,我们从学员、共同调查员、项目主管和学员支持网络的共同负责人那里收集了见解。他们的研究包括进行采访,有时涉及敏感或创伤性主题。利用公共卫生理论框架,对离职访谈和书面反馈进行归纳专题分析,我们制定了维护研究人员心理健康的指导方针。应对心理健康挑战的关键响应性干预措施包括定期培训和签到、减少受训者进行访谈的频率、采用战略处理访谈内容对心理健康的影响,以及积极主动地管理工作量。有希望的做法出现了,例如建立一个培训人员支持网络和资源纲要,整合汇报时间,确保清晰的沟通,以及适应期望和时间表。建议强调响应、协作和灵活性的重要性,以及正式的入职流程。研究团队,特别是那些规模庞大、地理分布分散或研究具有挑战性问题的研究团队,需要采用系统的方法来促进精神卫生、预防精神疾病和补救精神疾病。本研究为培育更健康、更支持性的研究环境提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: New Solutions delivers authoritative responses to perplexing problems, with a worker’s voice, an activist’s commitment, a scientist’s approach, and a policy-maker’s experience. New Solutions explores the growing, changing common ground at the intersection of health, work, and the environment. The Journal makes plain how the issues in each area are interrelated and sets forth progressive, thoughtfully crafted public policy choices. It seeks a conversation on the issues between the grassroots labor and environmental activists and the professionals and researchers involved in charting society’s way forward with the understanding that lack of scientific knowledge is no excuse for doing nothing and that inaction is itself a choice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信