Maintaining natural knee asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty: short-term outcomes of a novel soft-tissue balancing technique (a retrospective cohort study).

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Annals of Joint Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aoj-25-43
Jian Wu, Feng Pan, Jun Zhang, Chao Yang, Yuan Gao, Desu Luo, Mao Liu
{"title":"Maintaining natural knee asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty: short-term outcomes of a novel soft-tissue balancing technique (a retrospective cohort study).","authors":"Jian Wu, Feng Pan, Jun Zhang, Chao Yang, Yuan Gao, Desu Luo, Mao Liu","doi":"10.21037/aoj-25-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to relieve pain, improve function, and thereby enhance the quality of life. This study compares TKA using conventional mechanical alignment (MA) versus Intelligent Knee Planning and Alignment System (IKPAS) navigation-assisted soft tissue balancing that preserves key factors of knee natural asymmetry, evaluating differences in postoperative functional recovery and overall patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-diagnosed, K-L grade III-IV knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary unilateral TKA at Guizhou Hospital of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, between March 2024 and June 2024. According to the surgical methods, the patients were categorized into the study and control groups. Among them, 30 patients in the study group underwent unilateral TKA using the IKPAS navigation and a new method of soft tissue balancing technique to maintain the key factors of natural knee asymmetry. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon. Simultaneously, the other 30 patients in the control group underwent unilateral TKA using the guided traditional MA and gap-tension equality balancing technique. The first ambulation time, hospital stay duration, and operative time were compared between the two groups. Knee Joint Clinical Score (KJCS), Knee Joint Functional Score (KJFS), knee extension-flexion range of motion (ROM), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were assessed at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were followed for 1 to 9 months, with a mean follow up duration of 7±1.5 months. No surgical site complications (including infection or wound dehiscence) were reported in either group. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative KJCS, KJFS, and ROM, demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the kinematic alignment (KA) and MA groups (P>0.05). The study group demonstrated shorter first ground walking time and hospitalization time than the control group (P<0.05), with statistical significance. No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of surgical time (P>0.05). At the 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative follow-ups, the study group exhibited higher KJCS, KJFS, knee extension-flexion ROM, and FJS than the control group (P<0.05), with statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new method of soft tissue balancing in TKA by maintaining the natural knee asymmetry shows better clinical outcomes than the traditional gap-tension symmetric balancing TKA in a preliminary short-term follow-up study. The superior clinical outcomes of asymmetry-maintained TKA compared to traditional gap-tension equaled TKA implicated that the real balance of TKA is not simply defined as symmetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":"10 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-25-43","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to relieve pain, improve function, and thereby enhance the quality of life. This study compares TKA using conventional mechanical alignment (MA) versus Intelligent Knee Planning and Alignment System (IKPAS) navigation-assisted soft tissue balancing that preserves key factors of knee natural asymmetry, evaluating differences in postoperative functional recovery and overall patient satisfaction.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-diagnosed, K-L grade III-IV knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary unilateral TKA at Guizhou Hospital of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, between March 2024 and June 2024. According to the surgical methods, the patients were categorized into the study and control groups. Among them, 30 patients in the study group underwent unilateral TKA using the IKPAS navigation and a new method of soft tissue balancing technique to maintain the key factors of natural knee asymmetry. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon. Simultaneously, the other 30 patients in the control group underwent unilateral TKA using the guided traditional MA and gap-tension equality balancing technique. The first ambulation time, hospital stay duration, and operative time were compared between the two groups. Knee Joint Clinical Score (KJCS), Knee Joint Functional Score (KJFS), knee extension-flexion range of motion (ROM), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were assessed at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative follow-up visits.

Results: All patients were followed for 1 to 9 months, with a mean follow up duration of 7±1.5 months. No surgical site complications (including infection or wound dehiscence) were reported in either group. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative KJCS, KJFS, and ROM, demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the kinematic alignment (KA) and MA groups (P>0.05). The study group demonstrated shorter first ground walking time and hospitalization time than the control group (P<0.05), with statistical significance. No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of surgical time (P>0.05). At the 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative follow-ups, the study group exhibited higher KJCS, KJFS, knee extension-flexion ROM, and FJS than the control group (P<0.05), with statistical significance.

Conclusions: The new method of soft tissue balancing in TKA by maintaining the natural knee asymmetry shows better clinical outcomes than the traditional gap-tension symmetric balancing TKA in a preliminary short-term follow-up study. The superior clinical outcomes of asymmetry-maintained TKA compared to traditional gap-tension equaled TKA implicated that the real balance of TKA is not simply defined as symmetry.

全膝关节置换术中保持膝关节自然不对称:一种新型软组织平衡技术的短期结果(一项回顾性队列研究)。
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)的主要目的是减轻疼痛,改善功能,从而提高生活质量。本研究比较了采用传统机械校准(MA)的TKA与智能膝关节规划和校准系统(IKPAS)导航辅助软组织平衡的TKA,后者保留了膝关节自然不对称的关键因素,评估了术后功能恢复和总体患者满意度的差异。方法:回顾性分析2024年3月至2024年6月在北京积水潭医院贵州医院行原发性单侧TKA的60例美国风湿病学会(American College of Rheumatology, ACR)诊断为K-L级III-IV级膝关节骨性关节炎患者。根据手术方式将患者分为研究组和对照组。其中研究组30例患者采用IKPAS导航和一种新的软组织平衡技术方法行单侧全膝关节置换术,以维持膝关节自然不对称的关键因素。所有手术均由一名资深外科医生完成。同时,对照组30例患者采用传统MA和间隙张力平衡技术进行单侧TKA。比较两组患者首次下床时间、住院时间和手术时间。在术后1个月、3个月和6个月的随访中评估膝关节临床评分(KJCS)、膝关节功能评分(KJFS)、膝关节屈伸活动度(ROM)和遗忘关节评分(FJS)。结果:所有患者随访1 ~ 9个月,平均随访时间7±1.5个月。两组均无手术部位并发症(包括感染或伤口裂开)。基线特征,包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、术前KJCS、KJFS和ROM,在运动学对齐(KA)组和MA组之间无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。研究组首次地面行走时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P0.05)。在术后1、3、6个月的随访中,研究组表现出比对照组更高的KJCS、KJFS、膝关节伸屈ROM和FJS (p)。结论:在初步的短期随访研究中,维持膝关节自然不对称的TKA中软组织平衡新方法比传统的间隙张力对称平衡TKA具有更好的临床效果。与传统的间隙张力相等的TKA相比,不对称维持TKA的临床结果优越,这意味着TKA的真正平衡并不是简单地定义为对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信