Bridging Impasses Between Nurses and Providers.

Q3 Medicine
Edmund G Howe
{"title":"Bridging Impasses Between Nurses and Providers.","authors":"Edmund G Howe","doi":"10.1086/736148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractThis piece builds on research conducted and reported in this issue in which nursing students underwent simulation training to increase their confidence when discussing ethical conflicts with physicians. I discuss here the general importance of nurses and physicians finding ways to work optimally together, especially when they face difficult ethical dilemmas involving patients. These providers reducing any emotional conflict they might have with each other is critically important for several reasons. Chief among these reasons are the direct harm this will cause these patients, due to their feeling increased tension, and also, as a result of this increased tension, their thinking less clearly regarding their utmost medical needs and wants. I discuss why this need is increased when ethics decisions are at stake, and I suggest three specific practical approaches that providers in both groups can use to enhance their ability to interact more harmoniously and synergistically with each other. They can immediately adopt these suggestions in their clinical practices. Their ability to use these suggestions most effectively will, however, continue to increase if and as they continue to use and practice them over time. The positive outcomes for providers using these approaches, even for just a few minutes, may surprise them. Though brief, the difference these approaches can make may be disproportionately substantial. Encounters they dreaded, instead of being confrontational, may become caring, rewarding, and productive.</p>","PeriodicalId":39646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","volume":"36 3","pages":"207-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/736148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis piece builds on research conducted and reported in this issue in which nursing students underwent simulation training to increase their confidence when discussing ethical conflicts with physicians. I discuss here the general importance of nurses and physicians finding ways to work optimally together, especially when they face difficult ethical dilemmas involving patients. These providers reducing any emotional conflict they might have with each other is critically important for several reasons. Chief among these reasons are the direct harm this will cause these patients, due to their feeling increased tension, and also, as a result of this increased tension, their thinking less clearly regarding their utmost medical needs and wants. I discuss why this need is increased when ethics decisions are at stake, and I suggest three specific practical approaches that providers in both groups can use to enhance their ability to interact more harmoniously and synergistically with each other. They can immediately adopt these suggestions in their clinical practices. Their ability to use these suggestions most effectively will, however, continue to increase if and as they continue to use and practice them over time. The positive outcomes for providers using these approaches, even for just a few minutes, may surprise them. Though brief, the difference these approaches can make may be disproportionately substantial. Encounters they dreaded, instead of being confrontational, may become caring, rewarding, and productive.

弥合护士和提供者之间的僵局。
摘要这篇文章建立在这个问题上进行的研究和报道的基础上,在这个问题上,护理专业的学生接受了模拟训练,以增加他们在与医生讨论道德冲突时的信心。我在这里讨论护士和医生寻找最佳合作方式的总体重要性,特别是当他们面临涉及患者的困难道德困境时。这些提供者减少他们彼此之间可能产生的任何情感冲突是至关重要的,原因如下。这些原因中最主要的是,这将给这些病人造成直接伤害,因为他们感到紧张加剧,而且,由于这种紧张加剧,他们对自己最大的医疗需求和愿望的想法不太清楚。我讨论了为什么当道德决策受到威胁时,这种需求会增加,并提出了三个具体的实用方法,这两个群体的提供者都可以使用这些方法来增强他们彼此之间更和谐、更协同的互动能力。他们可以立即在临床实践中采纳这些建议。然而,随着时间的推移,如果他们继续使用和实践这些建议,他们最有效地使用这些建议的能力将继续提高。提供者使用这些方法的积极结果,即使只有几分钟,可能会让他们感到惊讶。虽然这些方法的作用很短暂,但它们所能产生的影响可能是不成比例的巨大。他们害怕的遭遇,而不是对抗,可能会变得关心、有益和富有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Ethics
Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信