Seong Soon Jang, Na-Young An, Hee Kyung Kim, Youngjun Yang, Gil Ja Huh, Joon Won Jeong
{"title":"Target Localization Accuracy of Image Registrations in Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer.","authors":"Seong Soon Jang, Na-Young An, Hee Kyung Kim, Youngjun Yang, Gil Ja Huh, Joon Won Jeong","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the target localization accuracy of image registration methods in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image guidance (IG) for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the associations with tumor characteristics such as size, mobility, and location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four methods involving different matching axes and regions were used to register the planning CT and 3D CBCT images of 36 lung tumors treated with SBRT. The registration axes were divided into 3D translational axes and 6D axes (translational and rotational axes), and the regions were divided into wide rectangular (WR) volume-of-interest (VOI) and tumor-focused (TF) VOI, consisting of the internal target volume (ITV) plus a 1 cm margin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the WR registrations, the TF registrations yielded higher localization accuracies for all registration pairs, with differences of 6.3%-9.1% in the percentage of inclusion of the registered CBCT gross tumor volume (GTV) into the ITV and 1.3-1.8 mm in the 3D distance between the ITV and registered CBCT GTV centroids. The TF3D and TF6D registrations yielded similar accuracy metrics of 91.9% and 1.4 mm, respectively, whereas the WR6D registration exhibited improved accuracies compared with the WR3D registration. The localization accuracies with the TF registrations decreased with increasing tumor mobility index, expressed as the ITV/GTV50% ratio, with significant differences between the tumor groups at a cutoff of 1.7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The localization accuracies of our image registration methods may serve as clinically useful references for selecting the most suitable registration in CBCT-based IG for lung SBRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 15","pages":"e70147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the target localization accuracy of image registration methods in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image guidance (IG) for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the associations with tumor characteristics such as size, mobility, and location.
Methods: Four methods involving different matching axes and regions were used to register the planning CT and 3D CBCT images of 36 lung tumors treated with SBRT. The registration axes were divided into 3D translational axes and 6D axes (translational and rotational axes), and the regions were divided into wide rectangular (WR) volume-of-interest (VOI) and tumor-focused (TF) VOI, consisting of the internal target volume (ITV) plus a 1 cm margin.
Results: Compared with the WR registrations, the TF registrations yielded higher localization accuracies for all registration pairs, with differences of 6.3%-9.1% in the percentage of inclusion of the registered CBCT gross tumor volume (GTV) into the ITV and 1.3-1.8 mm in the 3D distance between the ITV and registered CBCT GTV centroids. The TF3D and TF6D registrations yielded similar accuracy metrics of 91.9% and 1.4 mm, respectively, whereas the WR6D registration exhibited improved accuracies compared with the WR3D registration. The localization accuracies with the TF registrations decreased with increasing tumor mobility index, expressed as the ITV/GTV50% ratio, with significant differences between the tumor groups at a cutoff of 1.7.
Conclusions: The localization accuracies of our image registration methods may serve as clinically useful references for selecting the most suitable registration in CBCT-based IG for lung SBRT.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.