Oldřich Zahradníček, Pavel Kundrát, Irina Danilova, Pavel Bláha, Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová, Anna Jelínek Michaelidesová, Jaroslav Šolc, Jana Vachelová, Matěj Navrátil, Vladimír Vondráček, Lucie Dyčková, Marie Davídková
{"title":"Variations among glioblastoma cell lines in boron-mediated enhancement of cell killing by proton beams.","authors":"Oldřich Zahradníček, Pavel Kundrát, Irina Danilova, Pavel Bláha, Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová, Anna Jelínek Michaelidesová, Jaroslav Šolc, Jana Vachelová, Matěj Navrátil, Vladimír Vondráček, Lucie Dyčková, Marie Davídková","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-14658-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhancement in cell killing by proton beams in the presence of boron (natural mixture <sup>nat</sup>B: 80% <sup>11</sup>B, 20% <sup>10</sup>B) was reported, selectively in the Bragg peak region, putatively due to the proton-<sup>11</sup>B capture reaction. However, as some groups observed no such enhancement or assigned it to secondary neutron-<sup>10</sup>B capture, proton-boron capture therapy (PBCT) remains controversial. We previously validated this concept for U-87 MG glioblastoma cells. To test its generality and potential applicability for these tumours, we assessed PBCT using three further cell lines widely used in glioblastoma research. In U251 cells, <sup>nat</sup>B enhanced cell killing by protons in Bragg peak but also in plateau regions, effects of <sup>10</sup>B were even higher, and were found also for 18MV but not 6 MV photon beams (above and below photo-neutron production thresholds, respectively), suggesting a key role of secondary neutrons. For A172 and T98G cells, no enhancement was found at all. This variability among cell lines may stem from differences in boron uptake and/or in intercellular signalling likely needed to amplify the initial events in a few hit cells to population-level effects. Together with recent negative studies, the results suggest that potential clinical applications of PBCT are less promising than originally thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"29453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14658-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enhancement in cell killing by proton beams in the presence of boron (natural mixture natB: 80% 11B, 20% 10B) was reported, selectively in the Bragg peak region, putatively due to the proton-11B capture reaction. However, as some groups observed no such enhancement or assigned it to secondary neutron-10B capture, proton-boron capture therapy (PBCT) remains controversial. We previously validated this concept for U-87 MG glioblastoma cells. To test its generality and potential applicability for these tumours, we assessed PBCT using three further cell lines widely used in glioblastoma research. In U251 cells, natB enhanced cell killing by protons in Bragg peak but also in plateau regions, effects of 10B were even higher, and were found also for 18MV but not 6 MV photon beams (above and below photo-neutron production thresholds, respectively), suggesting a key role of secondary neutrons. For A172 and T98G cells, no enhancement was found at all. This variability among cell lines may stem from differences in boron uptake and/or in intercellular signalling likely needed to amplify the initial events in a few hit cells to population-level effects. Together with recent negative studies, the results suggest that potential clinical applications of PBCT are less promising than originally thought.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.