{"title":"Analysis of deformation rule of deep foundation pit excavation of railway station in soft soil with silt.","authors":"Weijian Liu, Zhonghe Wang, Zhizeng Zhang, Zhengyu Zhang, Yongfu Jia, Zhun Li","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-15139-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the behavior of retaining structures and the settlement of external surfaces in deep foundation pits located in areas characterized by muddy soft soil. The research evaluates the efficacy of two constitutive models-the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model and the modified Cambridge model-during the simulation of foundation pit excavation. By analyzing actual monitoring data collected from the site, the study identifies patterns in the settlement and deformation of both the retaining structure and the surface. Subsequently, the excavation process of the foundation pit is simulated using FLAC3D 6.0 software, employing both the Mohr-Coulomb and modified Cambridge models. A comparative analysis is conducted between the simulation results and the field monitoring data to assess the performance of the two models.The findings indicate that the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure in muddy soft soil exhibit cantilever behavior. The maximum horizontal displacement occurs near the excavation face, while the peak surface settlement is observed 15 m from the foundation pit, remaining within the established early warning thresholds. Although both models demonstrate a similar trend in the simulated displacement curves compared to the actual deformation curves, there are notable differences in accuracy. Specifically, the modified Cambridge model generally exhibits a lower error rate in simulating the horizontal displacement of the retaining structure compared to the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model. Furthermore, the modified Cambridge model provides a closer approximation to the measured values for surface settlement outside the foundation pit.In conclusion, for deep foundation pits associated with subway construction that utilize concrete support and underground continuous walls in muddy soft soil regions, the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure display cantilever characteristics. The modified Cambridge model demonstrates superior simulation performance, yielding results that are more closely aligned with actual monitoring data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"29383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15139-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the behavior of retaining structures and the settlement of external surfaces in deep foundation pits located in areas characterized by muddy soft soil. The research evaluates the efficacy of two constitutive models-the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model and the modified Cambridge model-during the simulation of foundation pit excavation. By analyzing actual monitoring data collected from the site, the study identifies patterns in the settlement and deformation of both the retaining structure and the surface. Subsequently, the excavation process of the foundation pit is simulated using FLAC3D 6.0 software, employing both the Mohr-Coulomb and modified Cambridge models. A comparative analysis is conducted between the simulation results and the field monitoring data to assess the performance of the two models.The findings indicate that the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure in muddy soft soil exhibit cantilever behavior. The maximum horizontal displacement occurs near the excavation face, while the peak surface settlement is observed 15 m from the foundation pit, remaining within the established early warning thresholds. Although both models demonstrate a similar trend in the simulated displacement curves compared to the actual deformation curves, there are notable differences in accuracy. Specifically, the modified Cambridge model generally exhibits a lower error rate in simulating the horizontal displacement of the retaining structure compared to the traditional Mohr-Coulomb model. Furthermore, the modified Cambridge model provides a closer approximation to the measured values for surface settlement outside the foundation pit.In conclusion, for deep foundation pits associated with subway construction that utilize concrete support and underground continuous walls in muddy soft soil regions, the horizontal displacement and surface settlement curves of the retaining structure display cantilever characteristics. The modified Cambridge model demonstrates superior simulation performance, yielding results that are more closely aligned with actual monitoring data.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.