LONG-TERM RESULTS OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LENS VAULT FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF POSTERIOR CHAMBER IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rui Silva, Marta Pereira, Christophe Pinto, Mariana Oliveira, José Mendes, Nuno Franqueira, Tiago Monteiro
{"title":"LONG-TERM RESULTS OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LENS VAULT FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF POSTERIOR CHAMBER IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS.","authors":"Rui Silva, Marta Pereira, Christophe Pinto, Mariana Oliveira, José Mendes, Nuno Franqueira, Tiago Monteiro","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe and compare the efficacy and safety profile of posterior chamber Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation in eyes with low-vault and non-low vault over a five-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, comparative, cohort study of patients submitted to ICL V4c implantation for myopia correction, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were created based on the first postoperative vault measurement evaluation (1 month): Group 1 (< 250 μm) and Group 2 (≥ 250 μm). Patients with previous ocular surgery or pathologies that would affect visual outcomes were excluded. The parameters evaluated were uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, subjective refraction, efficacy and safety index, predictability, endothelial cell density, central vault, and postoperative complications. One hundred seven eyes from 67 patients in group 1 and 289 eyes from 164 patients in group 2 were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 5 years, the safety and efficacy index were similar (p=0.224 and p=0.390, respectively). Respectively, 80 (76.2%) and 201 (70.5%) eyes were within ±0.50 D of targeted refraction. There was a significant reduction in vault measurements in both groups (p=0.034 and p<0.001, respectively). No significant differences between groups in endothelial cell density loss were noted (p=0.096). The low-vault group presented a higher incidence of crystalline lens opacities/cataracts (5.6% versus 1.7%), although only one patient in group 2 was submitted to cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICL implantation for surgical correction of myopia yielded stable visual results with excellent safety and efficacy indexes in patients with low vault.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe and compare the efficacy and safety profile of posterior chamber Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation in eyes with low-vault and non-low vault over a five-year follow-up period.

Setting: Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.

Design: Retrospective, comparative, cohort study of patients submitted to ICL V4c implantation for myopia correction, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Methods: Two groups were created based on the first postoperative vault measurement evaluation (1 month): Group 1 (< 250 μm) and Group 2 (≥ 250 μm). Patients with previous ocular surgery or pathologies that would affect visual outcomes were excluded. The parameters evaluated were uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, subjective refraction, efficacy and safety index, predictability, endothelial cell density, central vault, and postoperative complications. One hundred seven eyes from 67 patients in group 1 and 289 eyes from 164 patients in group 2 were evaluated.

Results: At 5 years, the safety and efficacy index were similar (p=0.224 and p=0.390, respectively). Respectively, 80 (76.2%) and 201 (70.5%) eyes were within ±0.50 D of targeted refraction. There was a significant reduction in vault measurements in both groups (p=0.034 and p<0.001, respectively). No significant differences between groups in endothelial cell density loss were noted (p=0.096). The low-vault group presented a higher incidence of crystalline lens opacities/cataracts (5.6% versus 1.7%), although only one patient in group 2 was submitted to cataract surgery.

Conclusions: ICL implantation for surgical correction of myopia yielded stable visual results with excellent safety and efficacy indexes in patients with low vault.

后房型人工晶状体植入术后晶状体拱顶的远期疗效和安全性。
目的:描述并比较低穹窿和非低穹窿眼后房型人工晶状体(ICL)植入术5年的疗效和安全性。地点:布拉加医院,布拉加,葡萄牙。设计:对接受ICL V4c植入术矫正近视的患者进行回顾性、比较、队列研究,随访时间至少为5年。方法:根据术后第一次拱顶测量评价(1个月)分为两组:1组(< 250 μm)和2组(≥250 μm)。既往眼部手术或病变会影响视力的患者被排除在外。评估的参数包括未矫正和矫正视力、主观屈光、疗效和安全性指数、可预测性、内皮细胞密度、中央拱顶和术后并发症。第1组67例患者共177只眼,第2组164例患者共289只眼。结果:5年时,两组的安全性和有效性指标相似(p=0.224, p=0.390)。80只眼(76.2%)和201只眼(70.5%)的目标屈光度在±0.50 D以内。结论:ICL植入术矫正近视的视力效果稳定,对于低穹窿患者具有良好的安全性和有效性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信