Heating Rate Optimization for Enhanced Precision in Thermoluminescent Dosimetry.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jordan D Noey, Joseph S Kopke, Kimberlee J Kearfott
{"title":"Heating Rate Optimization for Enhanced Precision in Thermoluminescent Dosimetry.","authors":"Jordan D Noey, Joseph S Kopke, Kimberlee J Kearfott","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000002017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study investigates the impact of heating rates, ranging from 1 °C s⁻1 to 20 °C s⁻1, on the precision of integrated peak counts determined using various thermoluminescent dosimeter materials. Lower heating rates influence precision due to prolonged integration of signal noise, while higher heating rates affect precision by pronounced thermal quenching effects. Using time-temperature profiles constructed with a linear heating ramp and a constant hold at maximum temperature, a range of heating rates was evaluated to identify an optimal condition that minimizes variance in integrated peak counts resulting from these effects. In addition, kinetic parameters of glow peaks were determined through peak deconvolution of each glow curve obtained and analyzed as a function of heating rate, with observed trends fit to appropriate models. These results were then compared to trapping parameters - namely the activation energy and frequency factor - independently extracted using the variable heating rate method to assess consistency across techniques. The results indicate that peak temperatures and intensities exhibit strong exponential dependence on heating rate, while activation energies and frequency factors show weak linear correlations. Trapping parameters obtained using the variable heating rate method fell within the range of values derived from peak deconvolution, supporting consistency between the two approaches. An optimal heating rate of 4 °C s⁻1 was identified for minimizing variance in integrated peak counts across all dosimeter types tested. Both noise and thermal effects were shown to influence measurement variance, with thermal quenching effects having a more pronounced impact at higher heating rates. Additional factors affecting precision included dosimeter material, glow peak temperature, and overall glow curve complexity. These findings enhance the understanding of thermoluminescent dosimeter behavior and highlight the importance of optimizing the heating rate for improved measurement reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000002017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of heating rates, ranging from 1 °C s⁻1 to 20 °C s⁻1, on the precision of integrated peak counts determined using various thermoluminescent dosimeter materials. Lower heating rates influence precision due to prolonged integration of signal noise, while higher heating rates affect precision by pronounced thermal quenching effects. Using time-temperature profiles constructed with a linear heating ramp and a constant hold at maximum temperature, a range of heating rates was evaluated to identify an optimal condition that minimizes variance in integrated peak counts resulting from these effects. In addition, kinetic parameters of glow peaks were determined through peak deconvolution of each glow curve obtained and analyzed as a function of heating rate, with observed trends fit to appropriate models. These results were then compared to trapping parameters - namely the activation energy and frequency factor - independently extracted using the variable heating rate method to assess consistency across techniques. The results indicate that peak temperatures and intensities exhibit strong exponential dependence on heating rate, while activation energies and frequency factors show weak linear correlations. Trapping parameters obtained using the variable heating rate method fell within the range of values derived from peak deconvolution, supporting consistency between the two approaches. An optimal heating rate of 4 °C s⁻1 was identified for minimizing variance in integrated peak counts across all dosimeter types tested. Both noise and thermal effects were shown to influence measurement variance, with thermal quenching effects having a more pronounced impact at higher heating rates. Additional factors affecting precision included dosimeter material, glow peak temperature, and overall glow curve complexity. These findings enhance the understanding of thermoluminescent dosimeter behavior and highlight the importance of optimizing the heating rate for improved measurement reliability.

提高热释光剂量测定精度的加热速率优化。
摘要:本研究探讨了加热速率(从1°C s⁻1到20°C s⁻1)对使用各种热释光剂量计材料测定的综合峰数精度的影响。较低的加热速率由于信号噪声的长时间集成影响精度,而较高的加热速率由于明显的热淬火效应影响精度。利用线性加热坡道和最高温度下的恒定保持构造的时间-温度曲线,评估了一系列加热速率,以确定一个最佳条件,使这些影响导致的综合峰值计数方差最小化。此外,通过对获得的每条辉光曲线进行峰反褶积来确定辉光峰的动力学参数,并将其作为加热速率的函数进行分析,将观测到的趋势拟合到适当的模型中。然后将这些结果与捕获参数(即活化能和频率因子)进行比较,这些参数是使用可变加热速率方法独立提取的,以评估不同技术之间的一致性。结果表明,峰值温度和强度与升温速率呈指数相关,而活化能与频率因子呈弱线性相关。变升温速率法获得的捕获参数在峰值反褶积的范围内,支持了两种方法之间的一致性。4°C s的最佳加热速率被确定为最小限度地减少所有测试剂量计类型的综合峰值计数的差异。噪声和热效应都显示影响测量方差,热淬火效应在较高的加热速率下具有更明显的影响。影响精度的其他因素包括剂量计材料、辉光峰值温度和总体辉光曲线复杂性。这些发现增强了对热释光剂量计行为的理解,并强调了优化加热速率以提高测量可靠性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信