{"title":"Bicarbonate Buffer Dissolution Test Using the Floating Lid Method: Inter-Laboratory Reproducibility of pH Maintenance.","authors":"Masahiro Fushimi, Masaki Higashino, Shotaro Ikuta, Hiroyuki Yoshida, Kiyohiko Sugano","doi":"10.1248/cpb.c25-00283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bicarbonate buffer (BCB) has been difficult to use in conventional dissolution tests because its pH rapidly increases as CO<sub>2</sub> escapes from the air-water interface. Recently, the floating lid method was introduced as a convenient method for using BCB in dissolution tests. This study aimed to confirm the inter-laboratory reproducibility of pH maintenance of BCB using the floating lid method for both paddle and flow-through cell (FTC) methods. Three pharmaceutical companies and 1 academic research institute participated in this study. A BCB solution (pH 6.5, 15 mM) was employed as the test solution. In the paddle method, the pH values of BCB rapidly increased without the floating lid. The pH change (ΔpH) at 6 h ranged from +1.66 to +1.82 (50 rpm) and +1.96 to +2.02 (100 rpm). The floating lid effectively maintained the pH values in all laboratories, with ΔpH ranging from +0.13 to +0.17 (50 rpm) and +0.21 to +0.25 (100 rpm). The standard deviation of ΔpH was within 0.05 at both 50 and 100 rpm. Similarly, in the FTC method, without the floating lid, ΔpH ranged from +1.71 to +1.77 (reservoir), +1.59 to +1.72 (FTC), and +1.73 to +1.76 (sampling tube). With the floating lid, ΔpH ranged from +0.05 to +0.10 (reservoir), +0.05 to +0.09 (FTC), and +0.26 to +0.39 (sampling tube). The standard deviation of ΔpH was within 0.05. In conclusion, the inter-laboratory reproducibility of pH maintenance of BCB using the floating lid method was confirmed for both the paddle and FTC methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":9773,"journal":{"name":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":"73 8","pages":"692-697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c25-00283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bicarbonate buffer (BCB) has been difficult to use in conventional dissolution tests because its pH rapidly increases as CO2 escapes from the air-water interface. Recently, the floating lid method was introduced as a convenient method for using BCB in dissolution tests. This study aimed to confirm the inter-laboratory reproducibility of pH maintenance of BCB using the floating lid method for both paddle and flow-through cell (FTC) methods. Three pharmaceutical companies and 1 academic research institute participated in this study. A BCB solution (pH 6.5, 15 mM) was employed as the test solution. In the paddle method, the pH values of BCB rapidly increased without the floating lid. The pH change (ΔpH) at 6 h ranged from +1.66 to +1.82 (50 rpm) and +1.96 to +2.02 (100 rpm). The floating lid effectively maintained the pH values in all laboratories, with ΔpH ranging from +0.13 to +0.17 (50 rpm) and +0.21 to +0.25 (100 rpm). The standard deviation of ΔpH was within 0.05 at both 50 and 100 rpm. Similarly, in the FTC method, without the floating lid, ΔpH ranged from +1.71 to +1.77 (reservoir), +1.59 to +1.72 (FTC), and +1.73 to +1.76 (sampling tube). With the floating lid, ΔpH ranged from +0.05 to +0.10 (reservoir), +0.05 to +0.09 (FTC), and +0.26 to +0.39 (sampling tube). The standard deviation of ΔpH was within 0.05. In conclusion, the inter-laboratory reproducibility of pH maintenance of BCB using the floating lid method was confirmed for both the paddle and FTC methods.
期刊介绍:
The CPB covers various chemical topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields dealing with biologically active compounds, natural products, and medicines, while BPB deals with a wide range of biological topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields including scientific research from basic to clinical studies. For details of their respective scopes, please refer to the submission topic categories below.
Topics: Organic chemistry
In silico science
Inorganic chemistry
Pharmacognosy
Health statistics
Forensic science
Biochemistry
Pharmacology
Pharmaceutical care and science
Medicinal chemistry
Analytical chemistry
Physical pharmacy
Natural product chemistry
Toxicology
Environmental science
Molecular and cellular biology
Biopharmacy and pharmacokinetics
Pharmaceutical education
Chemical biology
Physical chemistry
Pharmaceutical engineering
Epidemiology
Hygiene
Regulatory science
Immunology and microbiology
Clinical pharmacy
Miscellaneous.