Plant-based diets and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Alberto Murciano, Marcella Malavolti, Susan Fairweather-Tait, Stefania Paduano, Marco Vinceti, Tommaso Filippini
{"title":"Plant-based diets and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.","authors":"Alberto Murciano, Marcella Malavolti, Susan Fairweather-Tait, Stefania Paduano, Marco Vinceti, Tommaso Filippini","doi":"10.1017/S0007114525104157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) incidence has been steadily increasing over the past few decades. Several studies have evaluated the effect of plant-based, vegetarian or vegan diets on the risk of T2D, although their potential benefits need to be confirmed and characterised. We performed a literature search up to 10 July 2025, using the terms/keywords related to plant-based index (PDI), vegetarian/vegan diets and T2D. We included observational non-experimental studies evaluating adherence to such diets in adult subjects assessing T2D risk. We specifically considered overall PDI and related healthy PDI (hPDI) and unhealthy PDI (uPDI), assessing intake of different food groups. We included 36 studies published between 1999 and 2025. We found an inverse association between adherence to vegetarian/plant-based dietary patterns and T2D risk. This association was stronger, though statistically imprecise, for the vegan diet (RR = 0·65, 95 % CI 0·42, 1·00) and for lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet (RR = 0·68, 0·57, 0·82). For studies using plant-based indices, the RR were 0·82 (0·69, 0·82), 0·76 (0·69, 0·82) and 1·13 (0·98, 1·30) for overall PDI, hPDI and uPDI, respectively. In the dose-response meta-analysis, overall PDI and hPDI showed an inverse and almost linear association with T2D risk. Conversely, adherence to uPDI directly correlated with T2D risk. Overall, adherence to vegan/vegetarian diets may reduce T2D risk, while an unhealthy plant-based diet appears to linearly increase disease risk, indicating caution in the consumption of such unhealthy foods even if of plant origin. The beneficial association between vegetarian and healthy plant-based diets may have major public health implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114525104157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) incidence has been steadily increasing over the past few decades. Several studies have evaluated the effect of plant-based, vegetarian or vegan diets on the risk of T2D, although their potential benefits need to be confirmed and characterised. We performed a literature search up to 10 July 2025, using the terms/keywords related to plant-based index (PDI), vegetarian/vegan diets and T2D. We included observational non-experimental studies evaluating adherence to such diets in adult subjects assessing T2D risk. We specifically considered overall PDI and related healthy PDI (hPDI) and unhealthy PDI (uPDI), assessing intake of different food groups. We included 36 studies published between 1999 and 2025. We found an inverse association between adherence to vegetarian/plant-based dietary patterns and T2D risk. This association was stronger, though statistically imprecise, for the vegan diet (RR = 0·65, 95 % CI 0·42, 1·00) and for lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet (RR = 0·68, 0·57, 0·82). For studies using plant-based indices, the RR were 0·82 (0·69, 0·82), 0·76 (0·69, 0·82) and 1·13 (0·98, 1·30) for overall PDI, hPDI and uPDI, respectively. In the dose-response meta-analysis, overall PDI and hPDI showed an inverse and almost linear association with T2D risk. Conversely, adherence to uPDI directly correlated with T2D risk. Overall, adherence to vegan/vegetarian diets may reduce T2D risk, while an unhealthy plant-based diet appears to linearly increase disease risk, indicating caution in the consumption of such unhealthy foods even if of plant origin. The beneficial association between vegetarian and healthy plant-based diets may have major public health implications.

植物性饮食与2型糖尿病风险:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
在过去的几十年里,2型糖尿病(T2D)的发病率稳步上升。一些研究已经评估了植物性、素食或纯素饮食对T2D风险的影响,尽管它们的潜在益处需要得到证实和表征。我们使用与植物性指数(PDI)、素食/纯素饮食和T2D相关的术语/关键词进行了截至2025年7月10日的文献检索。我们纳入了观察性非实验研究,评估了成年受试者对此类饮食的依从性,评估了T2D风险。我们特别考虑了总体PDI和相关的健康(hPDI)和不健康(uPDI)评估不同食物组的摄入量。我们纳入了1999-2025年间发表的36项研究。我们发现坚持素食/植物性饮食模式与糖尿病风险呈负相关。这种关联在纯素饮食(RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.42-1.00)和乳蛋素食饮食(RR=0.68, 0.57-0.82)中更强,尽管在统计上不精确。对于基于植物的指数的研究,总体PDI、hPDI和uPDI的rr分别为0.82(0.69-0.82)、0.76(0.69-0.82)和1.13(0.98-1.30)。在剂量-反应荟萃分析中,总体PDI和hPDI与T2D风险呈负相关,几乎呈线性相关。相反,坚持uPDI与T2D风险直接相关。总的来说,坚持纯素/素食饮食可能会降低T2D风险,而不健康的植物性饮食似乎会线性增加疾病风险,这表明即使是植物性食品,也要谨慎消费这类不健康食品。素食和健康植物性饮食之间的有益联系可能具有重大的公共卫生意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信