The Prognostic Significance of the Serum Inflammatory Marker Ratios, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte, Platelet-Lymphocyte and Monocyte-Lymphocyte in Male Breast Cancer.
Dylan P McClurg, Michael Wong, Kirsty Luo-Yng Tay, Gordon Urquhart, Feng-Yi Soh, Abdalla Saad Abdalla Al-Zawi, Yazan Masannat, Beatrix Elsberger, Valerie Speirs
{"title":"The Prognostic Significance of the Serum Inflammatory Marker Ratios, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte, Platelet-Lymphocyte and Monocyte-Lymphocyte in Male Breast Cancer.","authors":"Dylan P McClurg, Michael Wong, Kirsty Luo-Yng Tay, Gordon Urquhart, Feng-Yi Soh, Abdalla Saad Abdalla Al-Zawi, Yazan Masannat, Beatrix Elsberger, Valerie Speirs","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2025.2523908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammation contributes to tumorigenesis and can be determined systemically from routine bloods collected through diagnostic workup by quantifying ratios of neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets and monocytes. Retrospective data from 104 male breast cancer (BC) patients was collected. We measured pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and quantitatively evaluated other male BC studies. Prognostic values of NLR and PLR were assessed by overall survival (OS). Elevated NLR (≥3.23) and PLR (≥129.53) were associated with significantly decreased OS. None of the previously reported cutoffs for NLR or PLR were significant when applied to our data. NLR remained associated with worse OS in a quantitative evaluation. Relationship between BMI and pre-operative NLR, PLR, and MLR ratios showed that severely obese patients tended to have higher PLR and MLR values. In conclusion, elevated NLR and PLR were linked to poorer outcomes in male BC. While more precise cut-off values are required to fully understand the potential of these biomarkers in managing BC in men, this study suggests that NLR and PLR may affect prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"391-398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2025.2523908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inflammation contributes to tumorigenesis and can be determined systemically from routine bloods collected through diagnostic workup by quantifying ratios of neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets and monocytes. Retrospective data from 104 male breast cancer (BC) patients was collected. We measured pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and quantitatively evaluated other male BC studies. Prognostic values of NLR and PLR were assessed by overall survival (OS). Elevated NLR (≥3.23) and PLR (≥129.53) were associated with significantly decreased OS. None of the previously reported cutoffs for NLR or PLR were significant when applied to our data. NLR remained associated with worse OS in a quantitative evaluation. Relationship between BMI and pre-operative NLR, PLR, and MLR ratios showed that severely obese patients tended to have higher PLR and MLR values. In conclusion, elevated NLR and PLR were linked to poorer outcomes in male BC. While more precise cut-off values are required to fully understand the potential of these biomarkers in managing BC in men, this study suggests that NLR and PLR may affect prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.