Sources of Stigma and its Relation to Internalized Stigma in Women with Borderline Personality Disorder.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Elia Solís-Villegas, María Yoldi-Negrete, Iván Arango de Montis, Ilyamín Merlín-García, Carlos-Alfonso Tovilla-Zárate, Ana Fresán
{"title":"Sources of Stigma and its Relation to Internalized Stigma in Women with Borderline Personality Disorder.","authors":"Elia Solís-Villegas, María Yoldi-Negrete, Iván Arango de Montis, Ilyamín Merlín-García, Carlos-Alfonso Tovilla-Zárate, Ana Fresán","doi":"10.62641/aep.v53i4.1926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has a high prevalence, presenting with self-injurious behaviors, suicide attempts and other psychiatric comorbidities. This condition is accompanied by high levels of stigma and self-stigma, driving to deleterious effects on prognosis. The present study aimed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with BPD with low and high internalized stigma and to address internalized stigma dimensions severity (disclosure, positive aspects, and discrimination) between the source of perceived stigma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 106 women with a diagnosis of BPD were evaluated for sociodemographic data, sources of stigma, the severity of the symptomatology and internalized stigma, evaluated with the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST) and the Spanish version of King's Internalized Stigma Scale (ISS), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with high internalized stigma reported greater symptom severity. Regarding the reported sources of stigma, in almost all sources of stigma, discrimination was perceived as greater (p < 0.05) (friends, co-workers, doctors, psychiatrists and nurses) as well as the perceived global internalized stigma (p < 0.05) for friends, co-workers and nursing staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is necessary to address stigmatizing behaviors by health personnel and the support network close to the patient in addition to improving awareness about associated internalized stigma which is related to worse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7251,"journal":{"name":"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria","volume":"53 4","pages":"683-692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62641/aep.v53i4.1926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has a high prevalence, presenting with self-injurious behaviors, suicide attempts and other psychiatric comorbidities. This condition is accompanied by high levels of stigma and self-stigma, driving to deleterious effects on prognosis. The present study aimed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with BPD with low and high internalized stigma and to address internalized stigma dimensions severity (disclosure, positive aspects, and discrimination) between the source of perceived stigma.

Methods: A total of 106 women with a diagnosis of BPD were evaluated for sociodemographic data, sources of stigma, the severity of the symptomatology and internalized stigma, evaluated with the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST) and the Spanish version of King's Internalized Stigma Scale (ISS), respectively.

Results: Participants with high internalized stigma reported greater symptom severity. Regarding the reported sources of stigma, in almost all sources of stigma, discrimination was perceived as greater (p < 0.05) (friends, co-workers, doctors, psychiatrists and nurses) as well as the perceived global internalized stigma (p < 0.05) for friends, co-workers and nursing staff.

Conclusion: It is necessary to address stigmatizing behaviors by health personnel and the support network close to the patient in addition to improving awareness about associated internalized stigma which is related to worse outcomes.

边缘型人格障碍女性的耻辱感来源及其与内化耻辱感的关系。
背景:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)发病率高,表现为自残行为、自杀企图和其他精神合并症。这种情况伴随着高水平的耻辱感和自我耻辱感,对预后产生有害影响。本研究旨在比较低内化污名和高内化污名女性诊断为BPD的人口学和临床特征,并探讨内化污名维度严重性(披露、积极方面和歧视)在感知污名来源之间的差异。方法:对106例诊断为BPD的女性进行社会人口学资料、耻辱感来源、症状学严重程度和内化耻辱感的评估,分别采用严重程度随时间界线评估(BEST)和西班牙版King's内化耻辱感量表(ISS)进行评估。结果:高内化污名的参与者报告了更严重的症状。就所报告的耻辱感来源而言,在几乎所有的耻辱感来源中,朋友、同事、医生、精神科医生和护士对歧视的感知更大(p < 0.05),而朋友、同事和护理人员对全球内化耻辱感的感知更大(p < 0.05)。结论:除了提高对与预后不良相关的内化污名的认识外,还需要解决卫生人员和与患者亲近的支持网络的污名行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría publicará de manera preferente trabajos relacionados con investigación clínica en el área de la Psiquiatría, la Psicología Clínica y la Salud Mental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信