Ambulatory physiological assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder: Integrating passive sensing with ecological momentary assessment to measure trauma reactivity.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Blair E Wisco,Cameron P Pugach,Casey L May,Paul J Silvia
{"title":"Ambulatory physiological assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder: Integrating passive sensing with ecological momentary assessment to measure trauma reactivity.","authors":"Blair E Wisco,Cameron P Pugach,Casey L May,Paul J Silvia","doi":"10.1037/abn0001028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of wearable technology affords objective measurement of physiological states outside the laboratory. We used ambulatory physiological assessment to measure overall arousal and reactivity to trauma reminders, a hallmark symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Ambulatory assessment improves upon laboratory-based tests by measuring actual trauma reminders as they occur in everyday life. In this study, we recruited a mixed-trauma sample of 80 participants (39 diagnosed with PTSD) who completed 3 days of ambulatory physiological assessment time-synced with self-reported ecological momentary assessments of trauma reminders and contextual factors. We assessed heart rate (interbeat interval [IBI]) as a nonspecific marker of overall physiological arousal, skin conductance and preejection period as markers of sympathetic activity, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia as a marker of parasympathetic activity. We found that individuals with and without PTSD did not significantly differ on average levels of any physiological marker. Among individuals diagnosed with PTSD, IBI was significantly lower, indicating higher arousal, when participants were reminded of their trauma. Trauma reminders were not significantly associated with respiratory sinus arrhythmia or preejection period. Skin conductance was significantly lower (indicating lower arousal) in the presence of trauma reminders, counter to predictions. For time-varying predictors, we found that trauma reminders were associated with weaker physiological responses, as indexed by IBI, when the reminders were perceived as controllable and when they were experienced in the presence of social support. Our findings support heart rate as an inexpensive and accessible marker that can elucidate the role of contextual factors affecting PTSD symptom expression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"743 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of wearable technology affords objective measurement of physiological states outside the laboratory. We used ambulatory physiological assessment to measure overall arousal and reactivity to trauma reminders, a hallmark symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Ambulatory assessment improves upon laboratory-based tests by measuring actual trauma reminders as they occur in everyday life. In this study, we recruited a mixed-trauma sample of 80 participants (39 diagnosed with PTSD) who completed 3 days of ambulatory physiological assessment time-synced with self-reported ecological momentary assessments of trauma reminders and contextual factors. We assessed heart rate (interbeat interval [IBI]) as a nonspecific marker of overall physiological arousal, skin conductance and preejection period as markers of sympathetic activity, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia as a marker of parasympathetic activity. We found that individuals with and without PTSD did not significantly differ on average levels of any physiological marker. Among individuals diagnosed with PTSD, IBI was significantly lower, indicating higher arousal, when participants were reminded of their trauma. Trauma reminders were not significantly associated with respiratory sinus arrhythmia or preejection period. Skin conductance was significantly lower (indicating lower arousal) in the presence of trauma reminders, counter to predictions. For time-varying predictors, we found that trauma reminders were associated with weaker physiological responses, as indexed by IBI, when the reminders were perceived as controllable and when they were experienced in the presence of social support. Our findings support heart rate as an inexpensive and accessible marker that can elucidate the role of contextual factors affecting PTSD symptom expression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
创伤后应激障碍的动态生理评估:整合被动感知与生态瞬时评估来测量创伤反应性。
可穿戴技术的发展使人们能够在实验室之外对生理状态进行客观测量。我们使用动态生理评估来测量对创伤提醒的总体唤醒和反应,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的标志症状。通过测量日常生活中发生的实际创伤提醒,门诊评估改进了基于实验室的测试。在这项研究中,我们招募了80名混合创伤样本的参与者(39名诊断为PTSD),他们完成了为期3天的动态生理评估,与自我报告的创伤提醒和环境因素的生态瞬时评估时间同步。我们评估了心率(心跳间隔[IBI])作为整体生理觉醒的非特异性标志物,皮肤电导和射血前期作为交感神经活动的标志物,呼吸窦性心律失常作为副交感神经活动的标志物。我们发现患有和没有创伤后应激障碍的个体在任何生理标志物的平均水平上没有显著差异。在被诊断为创伤后应激障碍的个体中,IBI明显较低,表明当参与者被提醒他们的创伤时,他们的觉醒程度更高。创伤提醒与呼吸性窦性心律失常或射血前期无显著相关性。与预测相反,在有创伤提醒的情况下,皮肤电导明显较低(表明唤醒较低)。对于时变预测因子,我们发现,当创伤提醒被认为是可控的,并且在有社会支持的情况下经历时,创伤提醒与IBI索引的较弱生理反应相关。我们的研究结果支持心率作为一种廉价且易于获得的标志物,可以阐明影响PTSD症状表达的环境因素的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信