Saving the reliability of inhibitory control measures? An extension of Huensch (2024) and Hui and Wu (2024)

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Zhiyi Wu, Ruirui Jia, Bronson Hui
{"title":"Saving the reliability of inhibitory control measures? An extension of Huensch (2024) and Hui and Wu (2024)","authors":"Zhiyi Wu, Ruirui Jia, Bronson Hui","doi":"10.1017/s0272263125101095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a close replication study of Darcy et al., (2016), Huensch (2024) reported a lack of clear relationships between inhibitory control (IC) and phonological processing, contrary to the initial findings. Given the general unreliability of response-time differences, which are often the basis of IC measures and could potentially mask small effects, we performed secondary analyses on Huensch’s (2024) open data set to investigate (a) the extent to which the reliability of IC measures could be improved using model-based approaches (Hui &amp; Wu, 2024), (b) the correlations between the different IC tasks, and (c) their predictive power for phonological processing, based on the more reliable indices. Results showed that model-based approaches generally improved reliability, and particularly for the Stroop and Simon tasks to acceptable levels. Yet, correlations between IC tasks remained low, and partial correlation and hierarchical regression still failed to reveal significant relationships between IC and phonological processing, further confirming Huensch’s (2024) findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263125101095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a close replication study of Darcy et al., (2016), Huensch (2024) reported a lack of clear relationships between inhibitory control (IC) and phonological processing, contrary to the initial findings. Given the general unreliability of response-time differences, which are often the basis of IC measures and could potentially mask small effects, we performed secondary analyses on Huensch’s (2024) open data set to investigate (a) the extent to which the reliability of IC measures could be improved using model-based approaches (Hui & Wu, 2024), (b) the correlations between the different IC tasks, and (c) their predictive power for phonological processing, based on the more reliable indices. Results showed that model-based approaches generally improved reliability, and particularly for the Stroop and Simon tasks to acceptable levels. Yet, correlations between IC tasks remained low, and partial correlation and hierarchical regression still failed to reveal significant relationships between IC and phonological processing, further confirming Huensch’s (2024) findings.

节省抑制控制措施的可靠性?珲春(2024年)和回吴(2024年)的延伸
在Darcy等人(2016)的一项密切复制研究中,Huensch(2024)报告了抑制控制(IC)与语音加工之间缺乏明确的关系,这与最初的发现相反。考虑到响应时间差异(通常是IC测量的基础,可能会掩盖小影响)的一般不可靠性,我们对Huensch(2024)的开放数据集进行了二次分析,以调查(a)使用基于模型的方法可以提高IC测量可靠性的程度(Hui &;Wu, 2024), (b)不同IC任务之间的相关性,以及(c)基于更可靠的指标,它们对语音处理的预测能力。结果表明,基于模型的方法通常提高了可靠性,特别是对于Stroop和Simon任务,可靠性达到了可接受的水平。然而,集成电路任务之间的相关性仍然很低,部分相关和层次回归仍然未能揭示集成电路与语音加工之间的显著关系,进一步证实了Huensch(2024)的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Studies in Second Language Acquisition is a refereed journal of international scope devoted to the scientific discussion of acquisition or use of non-native and heritage languages. Each volume (five issues) contains research articles of either a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods nature in addition to essays on current theoretical matters. Other rubrics include shorter articles such as Replication Studies, Critical Commentaries, and Research Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信