The future of sustainable food: Evaluating the effect of dynamic life cycle assessment methods on lettuce production ecoefficiency

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Reid Maynard, Jason C. Quinn
{"title":"The future of sustainable food: Evaluating the effect of dynamic life cycle assessment methods on lettuce production ecoefficiency","authors":"Reid Maynard,&nbsp;Jason C. Quinn","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural stakeholders must develop and implement greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures in coming decades to meet global climate targets. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can help identify optimal ecoefficiency measures, but standard static techniques offer limited insight as they do not incorporate the dynamics of a changing world. Dynamic LCA (DLCA) methods consider product systems over long time periods but are not frequently considered in the agricultural sector. Current methods utilized are limited to singular approaches isolated from other dynamic approaches. In this study, we apply three different DLCA methods to a United States leaf lettuce cradle-to-harvest product system: dynamic weather and crop modeling, upstream supply chain transformation modeling, and on-farm prospective technology adoption modeling. When DLCA methods are adopted, the 2050 lettuce production GWP results range is 0.15–0.19 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e kg<sup>−1</sup> lettuce across different locations, an average decline of 30 % from 2020 static LCA results. Scenario analysis of different technology change cases demonstrates how practitioners must carefully and transparently account for prospective technology adoption cases while also providing stakeholder insights into the comparative dynamic potential of emerging alternatives like renewable diesel and electric machinery. The results highlight near-term opportunities for emissions reduction in lettuce cultivation, such as irrigation electrification and renewable diesel usage, while exploring the potential of future investments like low-GHG fertilizer purchases and electrified heavy machinery investments which may not be apparent in static LCA. Additionally, the study demonstrates important considerations for LCA practitioners looking to incorporate dynamics in agricultural systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"522 ","pages":"Article 146245"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625015951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural stakeholders must develop and implement greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation measures in coming decades to meet global climate targets. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can help identify optimal ecoefficiency measures, but standard static techniques offer limited insight as they do not incorporate the dynamics of a changing world. Dynamic LCA (DLCA) methods consider product systems over long time periods but are not frequently considered in the agricultural sector. Current methods utilized are limited to singular approaches isolated from other dynamic approaches. In this study, we apply three different DLCA methods to a United States leaf lettuce cradle-to-harvest product system: dynamic weather and crop modeling, upstream supply chain transformation modeling, and on-farm prospective technology adoption modeling. When DLCA methods are adopted, the 2050 lettuce production GWP results range is 0.15–0.19 kg CO2e kg−1 lettuce across different locations, an average decline of 30 % from 2020 static LCA results. Scenario analysis of different technology change cases demonstrates how practitioners must carefully and transparently account for prospective technology adoption cases while also providing stakeholder insights into the comparative dynamic potential of emerging alternatives like renewable diesel and electric machinery. The results highlight near-term opportunities for emissions reduction in lettuce cultivation, such as irrigation electrification and renewable diesel usage, while exploring the potential of future investments like low-GHG fertilizer purchases and electrified heavy machinery investments which may not be apparent in static LCA. Additionally, the study demonstrates important considerations for LCA practitioners looking to incorporate dynamics in agricultural systems.
可持续食品的未来:动态生命周期评价方法对生菜生产生态效率的影响
农业利益相关者必须在未来几十年制定和实施温室气体缓解措施,以实现全球气候目标。生命周期评估(LCA)可以帮助确定最佳的生态效率措施,但标准的静态技术提供的洞察力有限,因为它们没有纳入不断变化的世界的动态。动态LCA (DLCA)方法考虑产品系统在很长一段时间内,但不经常考虑在农业部门。目前使用的方法仅限于与其他动态方法隔离的单一方法。在本研究中,我们将三种不同的DLCA方法应用于美国叶莴苣从摇篮到收获的产品系统:动态天气和作物建模、上游供应链转型建模和农场前瞻性技术采用建模。当采用DLCA方法时,不同地点的2050年生菜产量GWP结果范围为0.15-0.19 kg CO2e kg - 1生菜,比2020年静态LCA结果平均下降30%。对不同技术变革案例的情景分析表明,从业者必须谨慎、透明地考虑未来的技术采用案例,同时也为利益相关者提供有关新兴替代方案(如可再生柴油和电动机械)的比较动态潜力的见解。研究结果强调了生菜种植的近期减排机会,如灌溉电气化和可再生柴油的使用,同时探索了未来投资的潜力,如低温室气体肥料的购买和电气化重型机械的投资,这些在静态LCA中可能不明显。此外,该研究还展示了LCA从业者希望将动态纳入农业系统的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信