Heterogeneous Household Responses and Indoor Temperature Inequality in the Clean Heating Transition

IF 11.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xinzhu Zheng, Ling Zhang, Yuxin Bai, Jianhui Cong, Tianyi Zhang, Yue Ren, Jie Li, Yang Su, Junyuan Xu, Can Wang
{"title":"Heterogeneous Household Responses and Indoor Temperature Inequality in the Clean Heating Transition","authors":"Xinzhu Zheng, Ling Zhang, Yuxin Bai, Jianhui Cong, Tianyi Zhang, Yue Ren, Jie Li, Yang Su, Junyuan Xu, Can Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The residential clean heating transition has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving public health. However, most research to date has focused on its economic and environmental implications, with limited attention being paid to household behavioral responses and heating experiences. To address this gap, we conducted household surveys in Linfen, a city in northern China, and analyzed residents’ self-reported indoor temperatures, heating costs, and heated areas before and after the transition. The results reveal substantial disparities across clean heating pathways. Compared with households that are continuing to use coal or biomass, those switching to gas experienced a 1.7 °C drop in indoor temperature and an annual cost increase of 1318 CNY, suggesting energy-limiting behaviors in response to higher expenses. In contrast, households adopting electric heating reported a 1.2 °C temperature increase without a significant rise in costs. Further analysis using the Gini coefficient and Oshima index shows that indoor temperature inequality increased among coal-to-gas households, while no such trend was observed among coal-to-electricity households. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating behavioral responses and thermal equity into the design of clean heating strategies.","PeriodicalId":11783,"journal":{"name":"Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The residential clean heating transition has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving public health. However, most research to date has focused on its economic and environmental implications, with limited attention being paid to household behavioral responses and heating experiences. To address this gap, we conducted household surveys in Linfen, a city in northern China, and analyzed residents’ self-reported indoor temperatures, heating costs, and heated areas before and after the transition. The results reveal substantial disparities across clean heating pathways. Compared with households that are continuing to use coal or biomass, those switching to gas experienced a 1.7 °C drop in indoor temperature and an annual cost increase of 1318 CNY, suggesting energy-limiting behaviors in response to higher expenses. In contrast, households adopting electric heating reported a 1.2 °C temperature increase without a significant rise in costs. Further analysis using the Gini coefficient and Oshima index shows that indoor temperature inequality increased among coal-to-gas households, while no such trend was observed among coal-to-electricity households. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating behavioral responses and thermal equity into the design of clean heating strategies.
清洁供暖转型中的异质家庭响应和室内温度不平等
住宅清洁供暖转型已被证明在减少空气污染和改善公众健康方面是有效的。然而,迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在其经济和环境影响上,对家庭行为反应和供暖经验的关注有限。为了解决这一差距,我们在中国北方城市临汾进行了住户调查,分析了居民自述的室内温度、供暖成本和供暖面积在过渡前后的情况。结果揭示了清洁加热途径之间的巨大差异。与继续使用煤炭或生物质能的家庭相比,改用天然气的家庭室内温度下降了1.7℃,年成本增加了1318元人民币,这表明他们为了应对更高的费用而采取了限能行为。相比之下,采用电供暖的家庭报告称,在成本没有显著增加的情况下,温度上升了1.2摄氏度。利用基尼系数和大岛指数进一步分析表明,煤改气家庭的室内温度不平等加剧,而煤改电家庭则没有这种趋势。这些发现强调了将行为反应和热公平纳入清洁供暖策略设计的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering
Engineering Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
自引率
1.60%
发文量
335
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Engineering, an international open-access journal initiated by the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) in 2015, serves as a distinguished platform for disseminating cutting-edge advancements in engineering R&D, sharing major research outputs, and highlighting key achievements worldwide. The journal's objectives encompass reporting progress in engineering science, fostering discussions on hot topics, addressing areas of interest, challenges, and prospects in engineering development, while considering human and environmental well-being and ethics in engineering. It aims to inspire breakthroughs and innovations with profound economic and social significance, propelling them to advanced international standards and transforming them into a new productive force. Ultimately, this endeavor seeks to bring about positive changes globally, benefit humanity, and shape a new future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信