Comparative evaluation of V-Loc knotless closure system and silk sutures in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.8
Krithic Chithra Banu Vijayakumar, Geetha Sridharan, Tangutur Srinivasa Prasad, Megarasu Deepanjali, Bhuvaneshwari Parthasarathy, Nissi Evelyn R
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of V-Loc knotless closure system and silk sutures in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Krithic Chithra Banu Vijayakumar, Geetha Sridharan, Tangutur Srinivasa Prasad, Megarasu Deepanjali, Bhuvaneshwari Parthasarathy, Nissi Evelyn R","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01438-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sutures are the most frequently utilized to ensure a watertight seal, reposition the flap to its natural alignment, provide mechanical stability to secure tissues during the early healing phase, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the V-Loc Poly (p-dioxanone) knotless Tissue Control Device wound closure system and conventional silk suture in intra-oral closure following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective randomized split-mouth study involving 17 patients with bilateral mirror image third molars, one side received V- Loc unidirectional knotless barbed sutures while the other received silk sutures for the study and control group on a week's interval accordingly. The primary outcome parameter measured was wound closure time. Secondary outcome parameters measured were mouth opening, swelling, wound healing (Landry's index), and pain. The secondary outcome parameters were assessed on the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 14th postoperative days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The closure time showed a statistically significant difference, with an average time difference of 1.3 min. Additionally, wound healing was significantly different between the study and control groups on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.019) and day 14 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This absorbable knotless suture promotes efficient wound healing and prevents postoperative complications like infections or dry socket. The time taken for the closure of the socket is longer when a knotless suture is placed, though this technique has a learning curve that is generally short to moderate, which takes an average of 3-5 cases for the clinicians to adapt, and with a brief demonstration or by watching a technique video.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry, India, (ICMRNIMS) (registration No CTRI/2024/04/065383).</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01438-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Sutures are the most frequently utilized to ensure a watertight seal, reposition the flap to its natural alignment, provide mechanical stability to secure tissues during the early healing phase, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the V-Loc Poly (p-dioxanone) knotless Tissue Control Device wound closure system and conventional silk suture in intra-oral closure following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.

Methods: This is a prospective randomized split-mouth study involving 17 patients with bilateral mirror image third molars, one side received V- Loc unidirectional knotless barbed sutures while the other received silk sutures for the study and control group on a week's interval accordingly. The primary outcome parameter measured was wound closure time. Secondary outcome parameters measured were mouth opening, swelling, wound healing (Landry's index), and pain. The secondary outcome parameters were assessed on the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 14th postoperative days.

Results: The closure time showed a statistically significant difference, with an average time difference of 1.3 min. Additionally, wound healing was significantly different between the study and control groups on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.019) and day 14 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This absorbable knotless suture promotes efficient wound healing and prevents postoperative complications like infections or dry socket. The time taken for the closure of the socket is longer when a knotless suture is placed, though this technique has a learning curve that is generally short to moderate, which takes an average of 3-5 cases for the clinicians to adapt, and with a brief demonstration or by watching a technique video.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry, India, (ICMRNIMS) (registration No CTRI/2024/04/065383).

V-Loc无结缝合系统与丝线缝合在下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中的比较评价:一项裂口随机对照试验。
目的:缝线是最常用的方法,以确保水密密封,将皮瓣重新定位到其自然对齐,在早期愈合阶段提供机械稳定性以保护组织,并减少术后并发症的风险。本研究旨在评价和比较V-Loc聚对二恶酮无结组织控制装置缝合系统与传统丝线缝合在下颌阻生第三磨牙手术切除后的口腔内缝合效果。方法:17例双侧镜像第三磨牙患者进行前瞻性随机裂口研究,其中一侧接受V- Loc单向无结倒钩缝合,另一侧接受丝线缝合,实验组和对照组每隔一周进行一次。主要结局参数为伤口愈合时间。测量的次要结局参数为开口、肿胀、伤口愈合(兰德里指数)和疼痛。在术后第3天、第5天、第7天和第14天评估次要结局参数。结果:两组缝合时间差异有统计学意义,平均时间差异为1.3 min。术后第3天(p = 0.019)和第14天(p = 0.019)创面愈合差异有统计学意义(p = 0.019)。结论:可吸收无结缝线促进创面有效愈合,防止术后感染、干窝等并发症的发生。当使用无结缝合时,闭合窝所需的时间更长,尽管这种技术有一个学习曲线,通常是短到中等,平均需要3-5例临床医生适应,并通过简短的演示或观看技术视频。试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心(ICMRNIMS)(注册号CTRI/2024/04/065383)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信