One house, two bodies: Investigating non-traumatic companion deaths and challenges in the "Philemon and Baucis" syndrome.

IF 1.8
Ilaria Tarozzi, Lorenzo Gitto, Christopher C Borck, Deland Weyrauch
{"title":"One house, two bodies: Investigating non-traumatic companion deaths and challenges in the \"Philemon and Baucis\" syndrome.","authors":"Ilaria Tarozzi, Lorenzo Gitto, Christopher C Borck, Deland Weyrauch","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Companion deaths have received little attention in the forensic literature, especially those resulting from natural causes. These include so-called \"Philemon and Bauci\" deaths, referring to the natural demise of two emotionally bonded individuals, occurring within brief temporal proximity, conceptualized as the death of one person as a reaction to the death of the other. This study investigates companion fatalities documented by two large medical examiner offices in the United States over 10 years, focusing on cases where at least one individual's cause of death is non-traumatic. Ninety-two total companion cases met the inclusion criteria, including 14 double natural deaths characterized as caregiving relationships, where the dependent individual died after the natural death of the caregiver. Five companion cases were separately categorized as \"Philemon and Baucis-like\", as they were similar in features to the so-called Philemon and Baucis deaths previously described in the literature, and a caregiving relationship could not be substantiated. Other case types involved drug toxicity, carbon monoxide poisoning, hypothermia, and several unique causes and manners of death. The largest study on non-traumatic companion deaths to date, this investigation reveals the opportunities, challenges, overlap, and limitations in distinguishing between \"Philemon and Baucis\" deaths and double deaths resulting from caregiving relationships. Key points of emphasis in the investigation, autopsy, and certification of such companion deaths are discussed, as considerations for the practicing forensic pathologist.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companion deaths have received little attention in the forensic literature, especially those resulting from natural causes. These include so-called "Philemon and Bauci" deaths, referring to the natural demise of two emotionally bonded individuals, occurring within brief temporal proximity, conceptualized as the death of one person as a reaction to the death of the other. This study investigates companion fatalities documented by two large medical examiner offices in the United States over 10 years, focusing on cases where at least one individual's cause of death is non-traumatic. Ninety-two total companion cases met the inclusion criteria, including 14 double natural deaths characterized as caregiving relationships, where the dependent individual died after the natural death of the caregiver. Five companion cases were separately categorized as "Philemon and Baucis-like", as they were similar in features to the so-called Philemon and Baucis deaths previously described in the literature, and a caregiving relationship could not be substantiated. Other case types involved drug toxicity, carbon monoxide poisoning, hypothermia, and several unique causes and manners of death. The largest study on non-traumatic companion deaths to date, this investigation reveals the opportunities, challenges, overlap, and limitations in distinguishing between "Philemon and Baucis" deaths and double deaths resulting from caregiving relationships. Key points of emphasis in the investigation, autopsy, and certification of such companion deaths are discussed, as considerations for the practicing forensic pathologist.

一所房子,两具尸体:调查非创伤性伴侣死亡和“菲利蒙和柏西斯”综合症的挑战。
伴随死亡在法医文献中很少受到关注,特别是那些自然原因造成的死亡。其中包括所谓的“菲利蒙和鲍奇”死亡,指的是两个情感上有联系的人在短暂的时间内自然死亡,概念上是一个人的死亡是对另一个人死亡的反应。本研究调查了美国两家大型法医办公室10年来记录的伴随死亡病例,重点是至少有一个人的死因是非创伤性的病例。总共92例伴随病例符合纳入标准,包括14例双重自然死亡,其特征为照顾关系,其中受抚养个体在照顾者自然死亡后死亡。五个伴发病例被分别归类为“类似菲利门和柏西斯的病例”,因为它们在特征上与文献中先前描述的所谓菲利门和柏西斯的死亡相似,而且无法证实两者之间存在护理关系。其他病例类型包括药物中毒、一氧化碳中毒、体温过低以及一些独特的死因和死亡方式。这是迄今为止关于非创伤性伴侣死亡的最大规模的研究,该调查揭示了区分“菲利门和柏西斯”死亡和由照顾关系造成的双重死亡的机会、挑战、重叠和局限性。重点在调查,尸检,并证明这样的伴侣死亡进行了讨论,作为考虑到执业法医病理学家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信